Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,379

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion-Our Social Skin.

Glynn, Carroll J., Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth·1986·Social Forces

Abstract

In this work, Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann examines public opinion as a form of social control in which individuals, almost instinctively sensing the opinions of those around them, shape their behaviour to prevailing attitudes about what is acceptable. For the second edition, Noelle-Neumann has added three new chapters: the first discusses new discoveries in the history of public opinion; the second continues the author's efforts to construct a comprehensive theory of public opinion, addressing criticisms and defences of her spiral of silence theory that have appeared since 1980; the third offers a concise and updated summary of the book's arguments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2578842

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,379

Metadata

Authors
Glynn, C. J., & Noelle-Neumann, E.
Venue
Social Forces
Published
1986-03
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
828
ISSN
0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093143562
Cited by
1,379
References
0
FWCI
111.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion-Our Social Skin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2578842
The paper
Glynn, C. J., & Noelle-Neumann, E. (1986). The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion-Our Social Skin. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578842

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.