Cited by 259Media Influence and PoliticsNews Media Framing and Political CommunicationElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Has Cable Ended the Golden Age of Presidential Television?

Baum, Matthew A., Kernell, Samuel·1999·American Political Science Review

Abstract

For the past 30 years, presidents have enlisted prime-time television to promote their policies to the American people. For most of this era, they have been able to commandeer the national airwaves and speak to “captive” viewers. Recently, however, presidents appear to be losing their audiences. Two leading explanations are the rise of political disaffection and the growth of cable. We investigate both by developing and testing a model of the individual's viewing decision using both cross-sectional (1996 NES survey) and time-series (128 Nielsen audience ratings for presidential appearances between 1969 and 1998) data. We find that cable television but not political disaffection has ended the golden era of presidential television. Moreover, we uncover evidence that both presidents and the broadcast networks have begun adapting strategically to this new reality in scheduling presidential appearances.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2585763

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Starting with cable television and then evolving with the internet and social media, the media ecology has transformed into a niche system.

    “Starting with cable television (Baum & Kernell, 1999) and then evolving with the internet and social media, the media ecology has transformed into a niche system.”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Baum & Kernell, 1999

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. 10.2307/1960777 · DOI
  2. Grossman, 1981, Portraying the President: The White House and the News Media
  3. 10.4135/9781412984744 · DOI
  4. Broder, 1994, Washington Post, A19
  5. 10.1080/08838158809386696 · DOI
  6. 10.1086/268900 · DOI
  7. 10.2307/2132271 · DOI
  8. Snow, 1998, Los Angeles Times, F50
  9. Webster, 1991, Ratings Analysis: Theory and Practice
  10. 1993, Nielsen Tunes in to Politics
  11. Tomz, 1998, CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results
  12. Zaller, 1997, Do the Media Govern? Politicians, Voters, and Reporters in America, 296
  13. Stanley, 1998, Vital Statistics on American Politics, 1997–1998
  14. Bower, 1985, The Changing Television Audience in America
  15. 10.2307/1959141 · DOI
  16. Patterson, 1996, Bad News, Period, PS: Political Science and Politics, 29, 17
  17. Nye, 1997, Why People Don't Trust Government, 10.4159/9780674275928 · DOI
  18. Lowry, 1996, Los Angeles Times, F2
  19. 10.2307/2111529 · DOI
  20. 10.1521/soco.1990.8.1.125 · DOI
  21. Erikson, 1995, American Public Opinion: Its Origins, Content, and Impact
  22. Berke, 1998, New York Times, A14
  23. Rosenstone, 1993, Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America
  24. Popkin, 1994, The Reasoning Voter
  25. Sigelman, 1996, Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, 171
  26. King, 1998, Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation
  27. 1996, Markle Presidential Election Watch: Report Card
  28. Dionne, 1991, Why Americans Hate Politics
  29. Gujarati, 1995, Basic Econometrics
  30. 10.1086/269141 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/2647731 · DOI
  32. 10.2307/1955802 · DOI
  33. Boyer, 1988, New York Times, A10
  34. Cappella, 1997, Spiral of Cynicism, 10.1093/oso/9780195090635.001.0001 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/106591299604900307 · DOI
  36. Briller, 1990, Zooming in Closer on the News Audience, Television Quarterly, 25, 107
  37. Davis, 1996, General Social Surveys, 1972–1999
  38. Ansolabehere, 1995, Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate
  39. Hallin, 1994, We Keep America on Top of the World: Television Journalism and the Public Sphere
  40. 10.2307/2939040 · DOI
  41. Beville, 1985, Audience Ratings: Radio, Television and Cable
  42. Brody, 1991, Assessing Presidential Character: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support, 10.1515/9780804779876 · DOI
  43. Iyengar, 1987, News That Matters
  44. 1991, Media Monitor, 4
  45. Neustadt, 1960, Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents
  46. Minow, 1973, Presidential Television
  47. Rosenstone, 1997, American National Election Study, 1996: Pre- and Post-Election Survey
  48. Rutkus, 1976, Hearings on Federal Communication Commission Oversight, 2
  49. 10.2307/1959140 · DOI
  50. Hickman, 1984, Presidential Election Debates: Do They Matter?, Election Politics, 2, 10
  51. Norman, 1988, The Psychology of Everyday Things
  52. Maltese, 1994, Spin Control: The White House Office of Communications and the Management of Presidential News
  53. Miller, 1996, Presidential Persuasion andAttitudinal Change, 79
  54. 1996, Campaign 96: Debate Not a Hit, but Beats Game
  55. 10.2307/2111759 · DOI
  56. Bennett, 1986, Apathy in America, 1960–1984: Causes and Consequences of Citizen Political Indifference, 10.1163/9789004638532 · DOI
  57. Shogren, 1998, Los Angeles Times, A1
  58. Moisy, 1996, The Foreign News Flow in the Information Age
  59. Lowry, 1997, Los Angeles Times, F1
  60. Kernell, 1997, Going Public
  61. 10.2307/2111014 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baum, M. A., & Kernell, S.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
1999-03
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
99-114
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W2329087729
Cited by
259
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
cable television, prime-time television, political disaffection, audience ratings, broadcast networks, scheduling policies, political communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review