The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Has Cable Ended the Golden Age of Presidential Television?
Abstract
For the past 30 years, presidents have enlisted prime-time television to promote their policies to the American people. For most of this era, they have been able to commandeer the national airwaves and speak to “captive” viewers. Recently, however, presidents appear to be losing their audiences. Two leading explanations are the rise of political disaffection and the growth of cable. We investigate both by developing and testing a model of the individual's viewing decision using both cross-sectional (1996 NES survey) and time-series (128 Nielsen audience ratings for presidential appearances between 1969 and 1998) data. We find that cable television but not political disaffection has ended the golden era of presidential television. Moreover, we uncover evidence that both presidents and the broadcast networks have begun adapting strategically to this new reality in scheduling presidential appearances.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Starting with cable television and then evolving with the internet and social media, the media ecology has transformed into a niche system.
“Starting with cable television (Baum & Kernell, 1999) and then evolving with the internet and social media, the media ecology has transformed into a niche system.”
From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Baum & Kernell, 1999
Citations
Cites
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- 10.2307/1960777 · DOI
- Grossman, 1981, Portraying the President: The White House and the News Media
- 10.4135/9781412984744 · DOI
- Broder, 1994, Washington Post, A19
- 10.1080/08838158809386696 · DOI
- 10.1086/268900 · DOI
- 10.2307/2132271 · DOI
- Snow, 1998, Los Angeles Times, F50
- Webster, 1991, Ratings Analysis: Theory and Practice
- 1993, Nielsen Tunes in to Politics
- Tomz, 1998, CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results
- Zaller, 1997, Do the Media Govern? Politicians, Voters, and Reporters in America, 296
- Stanley, 1998, Vital Statistics on American Politics, 1997–1998
- Bower, 1985, The Changing Television Audience in America
- 10.2307/1959141 · DOI
- Patterson, 1996, Bad News, Period, PS: Political Science and Politics, 29, 17
- Nye, 1997, Why People Don't Trust Government, 10.4159/9780674275928 · DOI
- Lowry, 1996, Los Angeles Times, F2
- 10.2307/2111529 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.1990.8.1.125 · DOI
- Erikson, 1995, American Public Opinion: Its Origins, Content, and Impact
- Berke, 1998, New York Times, A14
- Rosenstone, 1993, Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America
- Popkin, 1994, The Reasoning Voter
- Sigelman, 1996, Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, 171
- King, 1998, Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation
- 1996, Markle Presidential Election Watch: Report Card
- Dionne, 1991, Why Americans Hate Politics
- Gujarati, 1995, Basic Econometrics
- 10.1086/269141 · DOI
- 10.2307/2647731 · DOI
- 10.2307/1955802 · DOI
- Boyer, 1988, New York Times, A10
- Cappella, 1997, Spiral of Cynicism, 10.1093/oso/9780195090635.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1177/106591299604900307 · DOI
- Briller, 1990, Zooming in Closer on the News Audience, Television Quarterly, 25, 107
- Davis, 1996, General Social Surveys, 1972–1999
- Ansolabehere, 1995, Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate
- Hallin, 1994, We Keep America on Top of the World: Television Journalism and the Public Sphere
- 10.2307/2939040 · DOI
- Beville, 1985, Audience Ratings: Radio, Television and Cable
- Brody, 1991, Assessing Presidential Character: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support, 10.1515/9780804779876 · DOI
- Iyengar, 1987, News That Matters
- 1991, Media Monitor, 4
- Neustadt, 1960, Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents
- Minow, 1973, Presidential Television
- Rosenstone, 1997, American National Election Study, 1996: Pre- and Post-Election Survey
- Rutkus, 1976, Hearings on Federal Communication Commission Oversight, 2
- 10.2307/1959140 · DOI
- Hickman, 1984, Presidential Election Debates: Do They Matter?, Election Politics, 2, 10
- Norman, 1988, The Psychology of Everyday Things
- Maltese, 1994, Spin Control: The White House Office of Communications and the Management of Presidential News
- Miller, 1996, Presidential Persuasion andAttitudinal Change, 79
- 1996, Campaign 96: Debate Not a Hit, but Beats Game
- 10.2307/2111759 · DOI
- Bennett, 1986, Apathy in America, 1960–1984: Causes and Consequences of Citizen Political Indifference, 10.1163/9789004638532 · DOI
- Shogren, 1998, Los Angeles Times, A1
- Moisy, 1996, The Foreign News Flow in the Information Age
- Lowry, 1997, Los Angeles Times, F1
- Kernell, 1997, Going Public
- 10.2307/2111014 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Myth of the Vanishing Voter
McDonald, M. P., & Popkin, S. L. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055400400134 · Cited by 448
How to study democratic backsliding
Druckman, J. N. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12942 · Cited by 56
Presidential Responsiveness to Public Opinion
Druckman, J. N., & Jacobs, L. R. (2010) · The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238859.003.0008 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Baum, M. A., & Kernell, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- ORCID
- Baum, Matthew A.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-114
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2329087729
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- cable television, prime-time television, political disaffection, audience ratings, broadcast networks, scheduling policies, political communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review