The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment
Open accessAbstract
We report the results of a randomized field experiment involving approximately 30,000 registered voters in New Haven, Connecticut. Nonpartisan get-out-the-vote messages were conveyed through personal canvassing, direct mail, and telephone calls shortly before the November 1998 election. A variety of substantive messages were used. Voter turnout was increased substantially by personal canvassing, slightly by direct mail, and not at all by telephone calls. These findings support our hypothesis that the long-term retrenchment in voter turnout is partly attributable to the decline in face-to-face political mobilization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables
Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902 · Cited by 4,230
Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America
Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,590
A Theory of the Calculus of Voting
Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305540011562x · Cited by 2,883
Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models
Rivers, D., & Vuong, Q. H. (1988) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(88)90063-2 · Cited by 1,630
Going negative : how political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate
Ansolabehere, S. D., & Iyengar, S. (1997) · Cited by 826
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1992) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1964016 · Cited by 443
The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment
Lau, R. R., Sigelman, L., Heldman, C., & Babbitt, P. (1999) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586117 · Cited by 430
Response Validity in Surveys of Voting Behavior
Traugott, M. W., & Katosh, J. P. (1979) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/268527 · Cited by 316
Getting Out the Vote: An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting
Gosnell, H. F. (1977) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 235
Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior
Eldersveld, S. J. (1956) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1951603 · Cited by 174
Cited by
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · Cited by 6,767
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054 · Cited by 3,071
The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting
DellaVigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187 · Cited by 1,602
From Violence to Voting: War and Political Participation in Uganda
BLATTMAN, C. (2009) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055409090212 · Cited by 898
The welfare effects of social media
Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20190658 · Cited by 857
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 653-663
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2106605967
- Cited by
- 1,380
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 71.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2585837
- The paper
- Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585837
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.