Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,628

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering

Veliyath, Rajaram, D'Aveni, Richard A.·1996·The Academy of Management Review

Abstract

AuszugNeue Technologien, globale Wettbewerber und flexible Produktionseinrichtungen führen zur Aufheizung der Märkte überall auf der Welt. Mit dem Wort „Hyperwettbewerb“ wird dieses Umfeld des äußerst häufigen und intensiven Wandels bezeichnet, das die Vorteile etablierter Anbieter erodiert. Generische Wettbewerbsstrategien wie Kostenführerschaft, Differenzierung und Fokussierung erweisen sich als instabil — sind angestammte Wettbewerbsvorteile noch nachhaltig? Welche Wettbewerbsstrategien sind in einem solchen Umfeld noch erfolgreich?

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/258639

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,628

Metadata

Authors
Veliyath, R., & D'Aveni, R. A.
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
1996-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
291
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014715894
Cited by
1,628
References
0
FWCI
185.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/258639
The paper
Veliyath, R., & D'Aveni, R. A. (1996). Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/258639

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.