The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis
Abstract
Long a fruitful area of scrutiny for students of organizations, the study of institutions is undergoing a renaissance in contemporary social science. This volume offers, for the first time, both often-cited foundation works and the latest writings of scholars associated with the approach to organization analysis. In their introduction, the editors discuss points of convergence and disagreement with institutionally oriented research in economics and political science, and locate the approach in relation to major developments in contemporary sociological theory. Several chapters consolidate the theoretical advances of the past decade, identify and clarify the paradigm's key ambiguities, and push the theoretical agenda in novel ways by developing sophisticated arguments about the linkage between institutional patterns and forms of social structure. The empirical studies that follow--involving such diverse topics as mental health clinics, art museums, large corporations, civil-service systems, and national polities--illustrate the explanatory power of institutional theory in the analysis of organizational change. Required reading for anyone interested in the sociology of organizations, the volume should appeal to scholars concerned with culture, political institutions, and social change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views
Oliver, C. (1997) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::aid-smj909>3.0.co;2-c · Cited by 2,852
A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey
Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505 · Cited by 2,315
Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (1998) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657333 · Cited by 2,307
Social Skill and the Theory of Fields
Fligstein, N. (2001) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00132 · Cited by 1,624
Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change
Checkel, J. T. (2001) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/00208180152507551 · Cited by 1,451
Metadata
- Authors
- Romanelli, E., Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 612
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985707021
- Cited by
- 1,740
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/258726
- The paper
- Romanelli, E., Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1992). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/258726
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.