The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weaving an Integrated Web: Multilevel and Multisystem Perspectives of Ecologically Sustainable Organizations
Abstract
Mark Starik, Gordon P. Rands, Weaving an Integrated Web: Multilevel and Multisystem Perspectives of Ecologically Sustainable Organizations, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Oct., 1995), pp. 908-935
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833
Levels issues in theory development, data collection and analysis
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258703 · Cited by 1,607
Cited by
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Gast, J., Gundolf, K., & Cesinger, B. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.065 · Cited by 614
Sustainability accounting—a brief history and conceptual framework
Lamberton, G. (2005) · Accounting Forum · doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2004.11.001 · Cited by 506
Wijen, F. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0218 · Cited by 459
The greening of strategic HRM scholarship
Jackson, S. E., & Seo, J. (2010) · Organization Management Journal · doi:10.1057/omj.2010.37 · Cited by 421
Metadata
- Authors
- Starik, M., & Rands, G. P.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 908
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031532215
- Cited by
- 885
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
