The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Studies in the Theory of Imperialism
Abstract
Journal Article Studies in the Theory of Imperialism Get access Studies in the Theory of Imperialism. Ed. by Roger Owen and Bob SutcliffeLondon: Longman. 1972. 390 pp. Bibliog. Index. £2.25. Brian Porter Brian Porter Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar International Affairs, Volume 49, Issue 3, July 1973, Page 444, https://doi.org/10.2307/2616848 Published: 01 July 1973
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The New Authoritarianism in Latin America
Pike, F. B. (1981) · Hispanic American Historical Review · doi:10.1215/00182168-61.1.150 · Cited by 405
Palma, G. (1978) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(78)90051-7 · Cited by 397
Law, State and Agrarian Society in Colonial India
Washbrook, D. A. (1981) · Modern Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/s0026749x00008714 · Cited by 368
Berger, M. T. (1990) · Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars · doi:10.1080/14672715.1990.10413131
Metadata
- Authors
- Porter, B.
- Venue
- International Affairs
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1973-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 444-444
- ISSN
- 0020-5850 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2346
- OpenAlex
- W2605923843
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 68.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studies in the Theory of Imperialism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2616848
- The paper
- Porter, B. (1973). Studies in the Theory of Imperialism. International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2616848
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
