The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Political Generations, Micro-Cohorts, and the Transformation of Social Movements
Abstract
In this paper the author proposes a generational model of continuity and change in social movements. Building on political generation and cohort replacement theories, he offers three propositions about generational processes in social movements : (1) the collective identity of an activist cohort remains consistent over time, contributing to movement continuity; (2) cohorts construct different collective identities based on the external contexts and internal conditions of the movement at the time they enter; (3) cohort replacement contributes to change in social movements. These three generational processes interact with organizational factors and political opportunity structures to shape movement continuity and change. He illustrates these propositions by drawing on an in-depth case study of the women's movement from 1969 to 1992 in Columbus, Ohio, and he suggests key questions about generational processes in other cases
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It “forms, not after an arbitrary number of years, but in response to significant changes in the environment and corresponding changes in individuals’ ‘transformative experiences’” (Whittier 1997: 762; Schuman and Scott 1988).”
From Young Feminist Activists in Present-Day China: A New Feminist Generation? (2018) · cites this paper as Whittier 1997
In the citing paper
“A political generation is “constructed socially rather than temporally.””
From Young Feminist Activists in Present-Day China: A New Feminist Generation? (2018) · cites this paper as Whittier 1997
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Young Feminist Activists in Present-Day China: A New Feminist Generation?
Wang, Q. (2018) · China Perspectives · doi:10.4000/chinaperspectives.8165 · Cited by 39
Portos, M. (2019) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764219831730 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Whittier, N.
- Corresponding author
- Whittier, Nancy
- ORCID
- Whittier, Nancy
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 760
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2330944470
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 11.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminism, Gender, and Social Issues
- Keywords
- political generations, cohort replacement, collective identity, women's movement, Columbus, Ohio, political opportunity structure, movement organization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review