The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sibship Size and Intellectual Development: Is the Relationship Causal?
Abstract
In this study we test the alternative interpretation of the effect of sibship size on childs intellectual development through sibling analysis and analysis of repeated measures of the same individuals. Both analyses are variations of change models or fixed-effects models. Change models enable us to control permanent family effects including family socioeconomic status (SES) family genetic makeup and intellectual atmosphere in the home by `differencing them out. Thus we can determine if and how much the sibship-size effect is confounded by other family influences that are difficult or impossible to control in conventional regression analysis. The data are from the [U.S.] National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY). Also included are comments by Meredith Phillips (pp. 188-92) and D. B. Downey B. Powell L. C. Steelman and S. Pribesh (pp. 193-98) and a reply by Guo and VanWey (pp. 199-206). (EXCERPT)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research on single children in the United States (e.g.,Blake 1981, Downey 1995) finds that only children do better in school than those with siblings, but this relationship is not necessarily causal(Guo & VanWey 1999).”
From The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy (2021) · cites this paper as Guo & VanWey 1999
Citations
Cites
PERSONALITY IN PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN: 1.—A bility and A chievement
EYSENCK, H. J., & COOKSON, D. (1969) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1969.tb02054.x · Cited by 100
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy
Cai, Y., & Feng, W. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090220-032839 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, G., & VanWey, L. K.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- ORCID
- Guo, Guang
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013955955
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 21.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- number of siblings, intellectual development, child intelligence, sibling comparison, fixed effects model, family impact, family socioeconomic status, genetic confounding, causal inference, National Longitudinal Survey of Youth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review