The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Internet and Political Control in Singapore
Abstract
GARRY RODAN is an associate professor of politics and a member of the Asia Research Centre at Murdoch University, Perth, Australia. His most recent books are Political Oppositions in Industrialising Asia and The Political Economy of South-East Asia.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Instead, they adopt less obvious techniques.”
From Informational Autocrats (2019) · cites this paper as Rodan 1998
Citations
Cited by
Guriev, S., & Treisman, D. (2019) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.33.4.100 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodan, G.
- Affiliations
- Murdoch University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Rodan, Garry
- ORCID
- Rodan, Garry
- Venue
- Political Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-89
- ISSN
- 0032-3195 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-165X
- OpenAlex
- W2005138264
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Political Science Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Socioeconomic Development in Asia
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
- Keywords
- internet, political control, Singapore, internet censorship, political communication, state control of information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review