Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 155Military and Defense StudiesMiddle East Politics and SocietyPolitical Conflict and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Military Professionalization and Civil-Military Relations in the Middle East

Kamrava, Mehran·2000·Political Science Quarterly

Abstract

MEHRAN KAMRAVA is assistant professor of political science at California State University, Northridge. His most recent books include Democracy in the Balance: Culture and Society in the Middle East and Cultural Politics in the Third World.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2658034

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kamrava, M.
Affiliations
California State University, Northridge (US)
Corresponding author
Kamrava, Mehran
Venue
Political Science Quarterly
Published
2000
Volume
115
Issue
1
Pages
67-92
ISSN
  • 0032-3195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-165X
OpenAlex
W2068575761
Cited by
155
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Political Science Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military and Defense Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
military professionalization, civil-military relations, Middle East, military personnel, military culture, democratization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.