Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 814

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm

Reeves, Jaxk H., Royall, Richard M.·1998·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

The First Principle Introduction The Law of Likelihood Three Questions Towards Verification Relativity of Evidence Strength of Evidence Counterexamples Testing Simple Hypotheses Composite Hypotheses Another Counterexample Irrelevance of the Sample Space The Likelihood Principle Evidence and Uncertainty Summary Exercises Neyman-Pearson Theory Introduction Neyman-Pearson Statistical Theory Evidential Interpretation of Results of Neyman-Pearson Decision Procedures Neyman-Pearson Hypothesis Testing in Planning Experiments: Choosing the Sample Size Summary Exercises Fisherian Theory Introduction A Method for Measuring Statistical Evidence: The Test of Significance The Rationale for Significance Tests Troubles with p-Values Rejection Trials A Sample of Interpretations The Illogic of Rejection Trials Confidence Sets from Rejection Trials Alternative Hypothesis in Science Summary Paradigms for Statistics Introduction Three Paradigms An Alternative Paradigm Probabilities of Weak and Misleading Evidence: Normal Distribution Mean Understanding the Likelihood Paradigm Evidence about a Probability: Planning a Clinical Trial and Interpreting the Results Summary Exercises Resolving the Old Paradoxes Introduction Why is Power of Only 0.80 OK? Peeking at Data Repeated Tests Testing More than One Hypothesis What's Wrong with One-SIded Tests? Must the Significance Level be Predetermined? And is the Strength of Evidence Limited by the Researcher's Expectations? Summary Looking at Likelihoods Introduction Evidence about Hazard Rates in Two Factories Evidence about an Odds Ration A Standardized Mortality Rate Evidence about a Finite Population Total Determinants of Plans to Attend College Evidence about the Probabilities in a 2x2x2x2 Table Evidence from a Community Intervention Study of Hypertension Effects of Sugars on Growth of Pea Sections: Analysis of Variance Summary Exercises Nuisance Parameters Introduction Orthogonal Parameters Marginal Likelihoods Conditional Likelihoods Estimated Likelihoods Profile Likelihoods Synthetic Conditional Likelihoods Summary Exercises Bayesian Statistical Inference Introduction Bayesian Statistical Models Subjectivity in Bayesian Models The Trouble with Bayesian Statistics Are Likelihood Methods Bayesian? Objective Bayesian Inference Bayesian Integrated Likelihoods Summary Appendix: The Paradox of the Ravens

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2669869

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 814

Metadata

Authors
Reeves, J. H., & Royall, R. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1998-09
Volume
93
Issue
443
Pages
1235
ISSN
0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101926378
Cited by
814
References
0
FWCI
22.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2669869
The paper
Reeves, J. H., & Royall, R. M. (1998). Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669869

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.