The Appropriateness of Some Common Procedures for Testing the Equality of Two Independent Binomial Populations
Abstract
Ralph B. D'Agostino, Warren Chase, Albert Belanger, The Appropriateness of Some Common Procedures for Testing the Equality of Two Independent Binomial Populations, The American Statistician, Vol. 42, No. 3 (Aug., 1988), pp. 198-202
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
G*Power 3 implements several procedures for testing the null hypothesis that two independent proportions are identical.
“Numerous procedures have been proposed to test the null hypothesis that two independent proportions are identical (Cohen, 1988;D'Agostino, Chase, & Belanger, 1988;Suissa & Shuster, 1985;Upton, 1982), and G*Power 3 implements several of them.”
From G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007) · cites this paper as D'Agostino, Chase, & Belanger, 1988
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 79
- Authors
- D'agostino, R. B., Chase, W., & Belanger, A.
- Venue
- The American Statistician
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 198-202
- ISSN
- 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2731
- OpenAlex
- W4233905448
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Statistician (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Keywords
- binomial populations, two-sample test, hypothesis testing, test procedure comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
