The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Child-Spacing Effects on Infant and Early Child Mortality
Abstract
For at least 60 years the deleterious effects of rapid childbearing on infant and early child survival chances have been the subject of study. The analyses of child spacing effects on infant and early childhood mortality presented here are based upon data from 26 developing countries which participated in the World Fertility Survey (WFS). All WFS data sets include a complete live birth history including the date of birth of all children born alive and information on their survival status and where relevant age at death. This information allows greater flexibility in analysis. Birth intervals can be calculated and counts of births in specific segments of time can be computed. It is also possible to estimate survivorship status of a birth at the time of some other event such as a subsequent birth or an anniversary of that subsequent birth. The goal is to explore some of the effects of child spacing both in terms of overall but localized rapidity and in terms of specific intervals. The approach adopted is to form counts of births in segments of time before and after the child in question or index child. 3 2-year of observation immediately prior to the birth of the index child are used forming counts of births 0-2 2-4 and 4-6 years before. The approach through the use of windows is designed for multivariate analysis. A table shows exponentiated parameter estimates or relative risks which result from fitting a common model to the data for each country. This model includes main effects for each of the 3 variables considered birth 0-2 and 2-6 years before the index child and mothers education. In general all 3 main effects were significant. The exponentiated parameter estimates for births in the 2 years preceding the index birth were startling. 1 such birth raised the risks by 50% or more in all but 2 countries and more than doubled the risk in 14 countries. These effects were consistently around 2 in Africa and over 2 in most of the Asian countries. 2 or more nearby births in the 2 years preceding the index birth had even more marked effects on neonatal mortality raising it at least 3-fold in 17 countries. In regard to the effects of childbearing experience in the 2-6 years before the index birth occurrence of zero births in this period led to varied relative risks compared with the baseline group. This zero group seemed to experience slightly lower mortality risks in most Latin American countries but little else can be said about patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cleland, J., Conde-Agudelo, A., Peterson, H., Ross, J., & Tsui, A. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60609-6 · Cited by 788
A new definition of maternal depletion syndrome.
Winkvist, A., Rasmussen, K. M., & Habicht, J. P. (1992) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.82.5.691 · Cited by 324
Evolutionary ecology of human life history
Mace, R. (2000) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1287 · Cited by 295
Beyond diet reconstruction: Stable isotope applications to human physiology, health, and nutrition
Reitsema, L. J. (2013) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.22398 · Cited by 289
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Child-Spacing Effects on Infant and Early Child Mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2737284
- The paper
- Hobcraft, J., McDonald, J. W., & Rutstein, S. (1983). Child-Spacing Effects on Infant and Early Child Mortality. Population Index. https://doi.org/10.2307/2737284
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.