Cited by 220Disability Education and EmploymentEducational Technology in LearningInclusive Education and Diversity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Universal Design for Learning: Technology and Pedagogy

King-Sears, Margaret·2009·Learning Disability Quarterly

Abstract

When educators hear the term universal design for learning (UDL), most associate it with technology (cf. Zascavage & Winterman, 2009). However, UDL is not solely about the use of technology in education (KingSears, 2001; Orkwis & McLane, 1998; Rose & Meyer, 2000). UDL is also about the pedagogy, or instructional practices, used for students with and without disabilities. The concept of universal design, which originated in the field of architecture in the 1970s by Ron Mace (Center for Universal Design, 1997), continues to have a major influence, particularly reflected in building structures that are now required to incorporate features (e.g., ramps, doorway widths) that enable more people with different needs to access buildings without the need to retrofit structural details (Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 1991). The main feature of universally designed buildings and products (whether a business or a home) is that they allow people with unique needs to independently and immediately use them is. Some of these features are structural (door handles instead of door knobs); others are technological (such as closed captions on television sets). Within universal design, seven guiding principles drive the design of products and environments so that they are usable by more people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design (Connell et al., 1997). When educators employ these principles in the design and delivery of instruction, acc…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/27740372

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Center for Universal Design., 1997, Environments and products for all people
  2. Connell B. R., 1997, Principles of universal design
  3. 10.1007/BF03395471 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00267.x · DOI
  5. 10.1177/073724770503000205 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/105735601300007606 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/00222194040370020201 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/105345120103700201 · DOI
  9. Orkwis R., 1998, A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access
  10. Rose D., 2000, Educational Leadership, 58, 39
  11. 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00282.x · DOI
  12. Suh J. M., Moyer P. S. (2008). Scaffolding special needs students' learning of fraction equivalence using virtual manipulatives. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Morelia, Mexico.
  13. 10.1177/00222194060390060201 · DOI
  14. Zascavage V., Winterman K. G. (2009). What middle school educators should know about assistive technology and universal design for learning. Middle School Journal, 46–52. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
King-Sears, M.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Education, George Mason University
Venue
Learning Disability Quarterly
Published
2009-11
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
199-201
ISSN
  • 0731-9487 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-376X
OpenAlex
W155221103
Cited by
220
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning Disability Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
Keywords
Universal Design for Learning, learning disabilities, educational technology, pedagogy, universal design principles, individualized education program, accommodation, manipulative materials, inclusive education, students with disabilities, differentiated instruction, assistive technology, assistive devices, assistive software, assistive services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review