The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Doing Attributions in Medical Interaction: Patients' Explanations for Illness and Doctors' Responses
Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of the process of offering and responding to attributions in social interaction. Analyses of audio and video recordings of patients' visits to an outpatient general internal medicine clinic reveal the ways in which patients offer their own explanations for their health problems, and how doctors respond to these explanations. In these explanation-response sequences, patients and doctors collaboratively enact an asymmetrical social organization wherein patients are authorities about their experiences but not about why their health problems occur. Patients exhibit caution when they offer explanations; they downplay their knowledge and they avoid setting themselves up for disaffiliative responses. Patients do not compel doctors to interrupt information gathering to assess their explanations. Doctors take these opportunities to focus on patients' symptoms. Patients' authority is thus restricted to the empirical realm rather than encompassing the analysis of empirical facts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0046234 · Cited by 6,223
Cited by
The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250506800103 · Cited by 1,748
Time allocation in primary care office visits
Tai‐Seale, M., McGuire, T. G., & Zhang, W. (2007) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00689.x · Cited by 472
Robinson, J. D. (2003) · Health Communication · doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1501_2 · Cited by 393
Drew, P., Chatwin, J., & Collins, S. (2001) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00125.x · Cited by 365
Understanding Diagnostic Conversations in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review
Huynh, K., Brito, J. P., Bylund, C. L., Prokop, L. J., & Ospina, N. S. (2023) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107949 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Gill, V. T.
- Venue
- Social Psychology Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 342
- ISSN
- 0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2335040433
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doing Attributions in Medical Interaction: Patients' Explanations for Illness and Doctors' Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2787034
- The paper
- Gill, V. T. (1998). Doing Attributions in Medical Interaction: Patients' Explanations for Illness and Doctors' Responses. Social Psychology Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.