The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Architect and the Bee: Reflections on the Work of Animals and Men
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“we do accept the argument that animals can be seen as investing their subjectivity, fictional or otherwise, in work in a comparable way to humans.”
From ‘Basically He’s a Pet, Not a Working Dog’: Theorising What Therapy Dogs Do in the Workplace (2024) · cites this paper as Ingold, 1983
Citations
Cites
Monod, J. (1974) · Studies in the Philosophy of Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-01892-5_20 · Cited by 967
The Use and Abuse of Biology: An Anthropological Critique of Sociobiology
Sahlins, M. (1976) · doi:10.3998/mpub.20259 · Cited by 912
Cited by
Sorted by citations
‘Basically He’s a Pet, Not a Working Dog’: Theorising What Therapy Dogs Do in the Workplace
Charles, N., & Wolkowitz, C. (2024) · Work, Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/09500170231161495 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Ingold, T.
- Corresponding author
- Ingold, Tim
- ORCID
- Ingold, Tim
- Venue
- Man
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1983-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0025-1496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2802018959
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Man (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographies of human-animal interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture, Modernity, and Design
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Architecture and Cultural Influences
- Keywords
- bees, human-animal relations, animal labor, human labor, beekeeping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
