CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Buffer Zones in the Cultural Ecology of Aboriginal Amazonia: An Ethnohistorical Approach

DeBoer, Warren R.·1981·American Antiquity
DOI 10.2307/280216
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Historical and archaeological evidence indicates that unoccupied buffer zones were a pervasive feature of the aboriginal cultural ecology of Amazonian floodplains. Buffer zones in Ucayali culture history are examined in detail, and the more general implications that such zones have for interpretations of Amazonian prehistory and ecology are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/280216

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lathrap's view of site instability due to river dynamics has been echoed by his students to explain the paucity of prehistoric settlement and terra preta soils, and may have dampened international interest in pursuing archaeological sites in the Peruvian Amazon.

    “Lathrap’s view of the salience of site instability due to river dynamics has been echoed by his students to explain the paucity of prehistoric settlement33 and terra preta soils27, and may have dampened international interest in the pursuit of archaeological sites in the Peruvian Amazon.”

    From Geolocation of unpublished archaeological sites in the Peruvian Amazon (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Lathrap, 1970, The upper Amazon.
  2. Denevan, 1976, The native population of the Americas in 1492
  3. Markham, 1859, Expeditions into the Valley of the Amazons, 1539-40, 1639.
  4. San Joseph, 1745, Propaganda Fide, 271
  5. Weber, 1975, Caimito: an analysis of the late prehistoric culture of the central Ucayali
  6. Roe Peter G. 1973 Cumancaya: Archaeological excavations and ethnographic analogy in the Peruvian montafla. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
  7. Flannery, 1976, The early mesoamerican village, 173
  8. Chirif, 1977, Los Shipibo-Conibo del oJto Ucayali.
  9. Hickerson, 1965, Man, culture, and animals, 43
  10. Meggers, 1971, Amazonia: man and culture in a counterfeit paradise.
  11. Mech, 1979, Why some deer are safe from wolves, Natural History, 88, 70
  12. Baer, 1969, VerhandJungen der Natur/orschenden Gesellschaft Brand, 80
  13. Cohen, 1977, The food crisis in prehistory
  14. 10.2307/277773 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1525/aa.1976.78.2.02a00230 · DOI
  16. Raymond J. Scott 1972 The cultural remains from the Granja de Sivia, Peru. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
  17. DeBoer Warren R. 1972 Archaeological explorations on the upper Ucayali fliver, Peru. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.
  18. Evans, 1968, Archeological investigations on the Rio Napo, eastern Ecuador.
  19. 10.2307/480948 · DOI
  20. Izaguirre, 1922-1929, Historia de las misiones Franciscanas y narración de los progresos de la geogTafia en el oriente del Peru., 14
  21. Ortiz, 1974, Alto Ucayali y Pachitea (2 Vols.)
  22. Tessmann, 1928, Menschen ohne Gott
  23. Harris, 1977, Cannibals and kings.
  24. Morey, 1978, Advances in Andean archaeology, 247, 10.1515/9783110810011.247 · DOI
  25. 10.1179/naw.1972.10-12.1.004 · DOI
  26. Steponaitis, 1978, Mississippian settlement patterns, 417
  27. 10.1525/aa.1975.77.3.02a00040 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
DeBoer, W. R.
Venue
American Antiquity
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1981-04
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
364-377
ISSN
  • 0002-7316
  • 2325-5064
DOI
10.2307/280216
Cited by
40
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 13078 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review