The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: a systematic review
Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2005) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2003.018085 · Cited by 1,541
Putting Education in “Educational” Apps: Lessons From the Science of Learning
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100615569721 · Cited by 1,049
An empirical examination of continuance intention of mobile payment services
Zhou, T. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.034 · Cited by 914
Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance
Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4 · Cited by 860
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., & Carhart-Harris, R. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00974 · Cited by 808
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilder, W. D., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S.
- Venue
- Man
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 690
- ISSN
- 0025-1496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4237844050
- Cited by
- 926
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2804304
- The paper
- Wilder, W. D., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (1989). Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Man. https://doi.org/10.2307/2804304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
