The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental Use of Clovis Weaponry and Tools on African Elephants
Open accessAbstract
Clovis projectile points and chipped-stone tools have been recovered in a number of archaeological sites in the New World, but these cannot be tested on mammoths, which we know from the archaeological evidence Clovis hunters were able to procure. Extensive culling of elephants in Hwange National Park in Zimbabwe provided the necessary animals to test replicas of Clovis tools and weaponry. The experiments leave little doubt that Clovis projectile points can inflict lethal wounds on African elephants and that simple stone tools will perform the necessary butchering tasks. The physiology of mammoths and elephants is similar enough to make positive statements on the potential of this kind of stone-tool and weaponry assemblage, but we will never be able to compare elephant and mammoth behavior directly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry
Hughes, S. S. (1998) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/bf02428421 · Cited by 360
Clovis Hunting Strategies, or How to Make out on Plentiful Resources
Waguespack, N. M., & Surovell, T. A. (2003) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/3557083 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Frison, G. C.
- Venue
- American Antiquity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 766-784
- ISSN
- 0002-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 2325-5064
- OpenAlex
- W2074435457
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental Use of Clovis Weaponry and Tools on African Elephants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/280681
- The paper
- Frison, G. C. (1989). Experimental Use of Clovis Weaponry and Tools on African Elephants. American Antiquity. https://doi.org/10.2307/280681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.