Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Migration in Prehistory: Princess Point and the Northern Iroquoian Case

Crawford, Gary W., Smith, David G.·1996·American Antiquity

Abstract

Snow has recently challenged the in situ theory of the origins of the Northern Iroquois, arguing that it is a controlling model that does not account for certain linguistic, social, ceramic, and settlement anomalies he identifies in the record of prehistoric Iroquoian development. He proposes a migration model that purports to respond to these anomalies. Data recently gathered from a project focusing on the Princess Point Complex of southern Ontario shed light on Snow’s hypothesis for a migration after A.D. 900. These new data do not support Snow’s migration scenario, at least as this model concerns Ontario and Princess Point.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/282018

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Snow, 1992, L'augmentation de la population chez les groupes Iroquoiens et ses consequences sur 1'etude de leurs origines., Recherches Amerindiennes au Quebec, 22, 5
  2. Gardner, 1992, Identification of Some Plant Remains from the Binghamton Mall Site, New York.
  3. Crawford G. W. and Smith D. G. 1997 AMS-Dated Early Late Woodland Corn (Zea mays) from the Grand Banks Site, Ontario, Canada. American Antiquity.m press.
  4. Smith, 1995, Origins of the People of the Longhouse: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Symposium of the Ontario Archaeological Society,, 55
  5. Jackson, 1983, Early Maize in South-Central Ontario., Arch Notes, 83, 9
  6. Noble, 1972, Porteous (AgHb-1): A Probable Early Glen Meyer Village in Brant County, Ontario., Ontario Archaeology, 19, 11
  7. Blake, 1983, Plant Remains from the Gnagey Site., Pennsylvania Archaeologist, 53, 83
  8. Snow, 1994, Great Lakes Archaeology and Paleoecology: Exploring Interdisciplinary Initiatives for the Nineties,, 283
  9. Bowyer, 1995, Palaeoethnobotanical Analysis of Two Princess Point Sites: Grand Banks (AfGx-3) and Lone Pine (AfGx-113) in the Grand River Area, Ontario
  10. Fox, 1995, Origins of the People of the Longhouse: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Symposium of the Ontario Archaeological Society,, 144
  11. Spence, 1990, The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650,, 125
  12. Chapdelaine, 1992, L'origine des Iroquoiennes: un debat., Recherches Amerindiennes au Quebec, 22, 3
  13. Snow, 1995, Origins of the People of the Longhouse: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Symposium of the Ontario Archaeological Society,, 5
  14. Williamson, 1990, The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650,, 291
  15. MacNeish, 1952, Iroquois Pottery Types.
  16. Zvelebil, 1986, Hunters in Transition,, 167
  17. Spence, 1984, The Early and Middle Woodland Occupations of Southern Ontario: Past, Present and Future Research, Arch Notes, 84, 32

Cited by

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Crawford, G. W., & Smith, D. G.
Venue
American Antiquity
Published
1996-10
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
782-790
ISSN
  • 0002-7316
  • 2325-5064
Cited by
25
References
11
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.