CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 135South Asian Studies and DiasporaIndian and Buddhist StudiesSocial and Economic Development in India

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Purity of Women in the Castes of Ceylon and Malabar

Yalman, Nur·1963·The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland
DOI 10.2307/2844332
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2844332

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 135

Related

Metadata

Authors
Yalman, N.
Corresponding author
Yalman, Nur
Venue
The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1963-01
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
25
ISSN
0307-3114 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/2844332
OpenAlex
W2797016792
Cited by
135
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 19
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › South Asian Studies and Diaspora
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Economic Development in India
Keywords
caste, Ceylon, Malabar, endogamy, marriage customs, female chastity, social taboos

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review