The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pine Invasions in the Southern Hemisphere: Determinants of Spread and Invadability
Abstract
Many factors interact to determine whether an introduced organism will become invasive. The widespread planting of many Pinus species at various densities and in many habitats at different times in the Southem Hemisphere (well outside their natural range) provides a unique opportunity to identify the determinants of invasive success for a large group of related organisms. At least sixteen pine species have spread from planting sites to invade natural or semi-natural vegetation. Species with adventive populations over fairly large areas are P. contorta Dougl., P. halepensis Mill,, P. nigra Arnold, P. patula Schiede & Deppe, P. pinaster Ait., P. ponderosa Laws., P. radiata D. Don and P. sylvestris L. This paper explores the biological profiles of successful invaders, the inherent and induced susceptibility of different vegetation types to invasion, patterns of invasion, the role of disturbance in initiating and sustaining invasions, the role of time, and the various functions of the resident biota in the receiving habitat in mediating the outcome of an introduction. This information, with evidence from contemporary studies of pine dynamics in the Northem Hemisphere and reconstructions of pine migrations in the early Holocene, shows that: (1) Most of the important invaders share a suite of biological traits that facilitate long-distance dispersal by wind, and allow invading populations to persist in habitats subjected to frequent disturbance. (2) The extent of invasion for widely planted species is positively correlated with the residence period. (3) Ground-cover categories can be ranked according to their vulnerability to invasion as follows: forest < shrubland < grassland << dunes < bare ground. (4) Disturbance regimes and the resident biota have a marked (and complex) influence on invadability. This information is used to predict future trends in pine invasions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Catford, J. A., Jansson, R., & Nilsson, C. (2009) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x · Cited by 1,154
Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants
Alpert, P., Bone, E., & Holzapfel, C. (2000) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1078/1433-8319-00004 · Cited by 911
A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions
Pheloung, P. C., Williams, P. A., & Halloy, S. R. (1999) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1006/jema.1999.0297 · Cited by 831
Self-citationForestry Trees as Invasive Aliens
Richardson, D. M. (1998) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96392.x · Cited by 613
Self-citationA theory of seed plant invasiveness: The first sketch
Rejmánek, M. (1996) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(96)00026-2 · Cited by 506
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, D. M., Williams, P. A., & Hobbs, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biogeography
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 511
- ISSN
- 0305-0270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021554165
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pine Invasions in the Southern Hemisphere: Determinants of Spread and Invadability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2845655
- The paper
- Richardson, D. M., Williams, P. A., & Hobbs, R. J. (1994). Pine Invasions in the Southern Hemisphere: Determinants of Spread and Invadability. Journal of Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.2307/2845655
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.