Bodily Bonds: The Intersecting Rhetorics of Feminism and Abolition
Abstract
Research Article| October 01 1988 Bodily Bonds: The Intersecting Rhetorics of Feminism and Abolition Karen Sánchez-Eppler Karen Sánchez-Eppler Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Representations (1988) 24: 28–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928475 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Karen Sánchez-Eppler; Bodily Bonds: The Intersecting Rhetorics of Feminism and Abolition. Representations 1 October 1988; 24 28–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2928475 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRepresentations Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1988 The Regents of the University of California Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other scholars have noted that rhetoric about Blackness and whiteness is inconsistent in The Slave's Friend itself.
“Other scholars have also noted that rhetoric about Blackness and whiteness is inconsistent in The Slave's Friend itself.”
From The Creation of Adam and the Biblical Origins of Race in The Slave’s Friend (1836–1838) (2021) · cites this paper as Sánchez-Eppler 1988
Karen Sánchez-Eppler notes the absurdly paradoxical rhetoric in which blackness, where it refers to things besides skin color, is still associated with evil and set in opposition to whiteness, which signifies the good.
“Karen Sánchez-Eppler notes, for example, the “absurdly paradoxical rhetoric” in which blackness-where it refers to things besides skin color-is still associated with evil and set in opposition to whiteness, which signifies the good”
From The Creation of Adam and the Biblical Origins of Race in The Slave’s Friend (1836–1838) (2021) · cites this paper as Sánchez-Eppler 1988
Sánchez-Eppler points to a story titled Apple and the Chestnut in Volume 1, in which the narrator likens the moral development of children to the core of an apple.
“Sánchez-Eppler points to a story titled “Apple and the Chestnut” in Volume 1, in which the narrator likens the moral development of children to the core of an apple”
From The Creation of Adam and the Biblical Origins of Race in The Slave’s Friend (1836–1838) (2021) · cites this paper as Sánchez-Eppler 1988
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Creation of Adam and the Biblical Origins of Race in The Slave’s Friend (1836–1838)
Sonia, K. M. (2021) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel12100860
“Karen Sánchez-Eppler notes, for example, the “absurdly paradoxical rhetoric” in which blackness—where it refers to things besides skin color—is still associated with evil and set in opposition to whiteness, which signifies the good (Sánchez-Eppler 1988, pp. 28–59, 56–57, n. 40).”
Background
- Authors
- Sánchez-Eppler, K.
- Corresponding author
- Sánchez-Eppler, Karen
- Venue
- Representations
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 24
- Pages
- 28-59
- ISSN
- 0734-6018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010723246
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Representations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- feminism, abolition, rhetoric, intersectionality, race and gender
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
