The Image of Objectivity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Documenting on-the-ground processes creates a stable and tangible basis for knowledge building and legitimation.
“Furthermore, documenting on-the-ground processes creates a stable and tangible basis for knowledge building and legitimation15.”
From The algorithm journey map: a tangible approach to implementing AI solutions in healthcare (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Giner-Sorolla, R. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612457576 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Regulatory objectivity and the generation and management of evidence in medicine
Cambrosio, A., Keating, P., Schlich, T., & Weisz, G. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.12.007 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Passi, S., & Jackson, S. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274405 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Datatrust: Or, the political quest for numerical evidence and the epistemologies of Big Data
Rieder, G., & Simon, J. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951716649398 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
The applicability of generalisability and bias to health professions education's research
Varpio, L., O'Brien, B., Rees, C. E., Monrouxe, L., Ajjawi, R., & Paradis, E. (2021) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14348 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
The algorithm journey map: a tangible approach to implementing AI solutions in healthcare
Boag, W., Hasan, A., Kim, J. Y., Revoir, M., Nichols, M., Ratliff, W., Gao, M., Zilberstein, S., Samad, Z., Hoodbhoy, Z., et al. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01061-4 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Furthermore, documenting on-the-ground processes creates a stable and tangible basis for knowledge building and legitimation 15 .”
Background
- Authors
- Daston, L., & Galison, P.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- Representations
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-128
- ISSN
- 0734-6018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049648156
- Cited by
- 1,269
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 145.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Representations (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Visual Culture and Art Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Keywords
- objectivity, history of science, epistemology, scientific representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
