Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Export of Nutrients and Recovery of Stable Conditions Following Deforestation at Hubbard Brook

Bormann, F. H., Likens, G. E., Siccama, T. G., Pierce, R. S., Eaton, J. S.·1974·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

We report the effects of deforestation on the export of particulate matter, erodibility of the ecosystem, and the relative importance of dissolved substances and particulate matter in exported materials. The mature forested ecosystem is little affected by erosion, with an average annual particulate matter export of only 2.5 MT (metric tons) km—2 yr—1. Deforestation and repression of growth for 3 yr increased export to a maximum of 38 MT km—2 yr—1, but the increase in export was exponential with rather minor increases in the first 2 yr after cutting and a sharp increase in the 3rd yr. This resulted because the ecosystem continued to exercise considerable control over erodibility for 2 yr after cutting without annual renewal of biotic regulation by primary productivity. Increases in particulate matter export are primarily due to increases in erodibility rather than increased flow rates. In the mature ecosystem, the average ratio of annual net export of dissolved substance to particulate matter is 2.3. Deforestation shifts this ratio to >8.0 during the first 2 yr after cutting. This shift results because the export trends, for dissolved substances and particulate matter following deforestation, are not synchronous. The first response to deforestation is mobilization of nutrients from the available nutrient and organic matter compartments and leakage in stream water. After 2 yr, particulate matter output rises sharply as biotic control of erodibility weakens, while dissolved substance export declines, probably because of diminution of readily available nutrients stored within the system. This nonsynchrony, coupled with the action of natural species adapted to take advantage of the abundance of nutrients and water that results immediately after disturbance, may be considered as part of a homeostatic mechanism that allows rapid recovery of a forest ecosystem while minimizing the effects of erosion. Thus, following destruction of the vegetation, the ecosystem maintains a residual resistance to erosion and has a high potential for repair through successional productivity. Nutrient flux and erosion losses return to previous levels as the intrasystem aspects of the hydrologic—nutrient cycle interaction and erodibility are increasingly regulated by biotic factors. These results relative to stable conditions and their reestablishment following disturbance may have applicability to a wide range of terrestrial ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2937031

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Bormann, F. H., Likens, G. E., Siccama, T. G., Pierce, R. S., & Eaton, J. S.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1974-06
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
255-277
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2136817827
Cited by
315
References
0
FWCI
34.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Export of Nutrients and Recovery of Stable Conditions Following Deforestation at Hubbard Brook. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2937031
The paper
Bormann, F. H., Likens, G. E., Siccama, T. G., Pierce, R. S., & Eaton, J. S. (1974). The Export of Nutrients and Recovery of Stable Conditions Following Deforestation at Hubbard Brook. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937031

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.