Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phylogeny, Ecology, and the Richness of Parasite Communities in Vertebrates: Ecological Archives M065-001

Poulin, Robert·1995·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

The makeup of parasite communities is the result, among other factors, of interactions between the evolutionary history and ecological characteristics of hosts. This study evaluates the relative importance of some ecological factors (host body size, diet, habitat, latitude, and the mean number of parasite individuals per host) as determinants or correlates of parasite community richness in vertebrates, before and after controlling for potential effects of host phylogenetic relationships. Data were obtained from the literature on 596 parasite communities belonging to one of four distinct types: gastrointestinal parasite communities of fish, birds, or mammals, and ectoparasite communities of fish. There were positive correlations between the number of hosts sampled and mean species richness of the parasite community of each genus. In analyses treating host genera as independent statistical observations and using estimates of parasite species richness corrected for host sample size, positive correlations were observed between richness and host body size in gastrointestinal communities of all three groups of vertebrates. The mean number of parasite individuals per host also was correlated positively with species richness. In fish, richness increased with increases in the proportion of animal food in the host diet. Aquatic birds had richer parasite communities than their terrestrial counterparts, whereas marine fish had richer gastrointestinal parasite communities than freshwater fish. The richness of ectoparasite communities on fish showed no association with any of the ecological variables investigated. Using host genera as independent points in the analyses may lead to biased results since some host lineages are descended from recent common ancestors, and are therefore not truly independent. The comparative analysis was repeated using phylogenetically independent contrasts derived from the phylogeny of hosts. Once the effects of host phylogeny were removed, somewhat different results were obtained: host body size showed no relationship with parasite species richness in birds, and there was no evidence that habitat transitions resulted in significant changes in parasite species richness in any of the types of communities studied. Of the ecological factors studied, the comparative analyses suggest that only host body size can be an important determinant of parasite community richness in certain host groups. This study illustrates clearly the need to control for phylogeny in investigations of host—parasite interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2937061

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Authors
Poulin, R.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-08
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
283-302
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2081387123
Cited by
362
References
2
FWCI
12.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogeny, Ecology, and the Richness of Parasite Communities in Vertebrates: Ecological Archives M065-001. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2937061
The paper
Poulin, R. (1995). Phylogeny, Ecology, and the Richness of Parasite Communities in Vertebrates: Ecological Archives M065-001. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937061

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.