The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Finding and Losing Host Plants by Phyllotreta: Patch Size and Surrounding Habitat
Abstract
This study examined the effects of size and surrounding habitat of food plant patches on the density, immigration, and emigration of two specialized phytophagous insects. Two flea beetles, Phyllotreta cruciferae and P. striolata, were censused for 3 wk in host plant patches of four sizes, with background vegetation of three types. Densities of both beetle species declined with decreasing patch size. Single isolated host plants (collards) were without flea beetles because of high rates of emigration. By releasing and recapturing marked flea beetles, I found that the emigration rates of both beetle species consistently increased with decreasing patch size. This sensitivity of emigration to host patch size may be common among phytophagous insects because of simple changes iin perimeter:area ratios. When this is the case there may be a “critical patch size” below which host islands do not sustain herbivore populations. Immigration rates were also affected by patch size and habitat, but only in P. striolata, not in P. cruciferae. Even in P. striolata, variation in immigration was less consistent and less dramatic than was variation in emigration. Beetles wandering out of patches apparently do not readily return to the host patch. To quantify how far beetles would have to wander before “losing” their host patch, I released marked beetles in two different habitats (a goldenrod field or a cultivated garden) at varying distance (2, 4, 6, or 8 m) from a target patch of collards. For both beetles species, the percentage of individuals discovering the collards after 1 d declined rapidly beyond 2 m and was dramatically reduced by the persence of goldenrod between released beetles and the collard target.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bowler, D. E., & Benton, T. G. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793104006645 · Cited by 1,904
Vegetational Diversity and Arthropod Population Response
Andow, D. A. (1991) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.003021 · Cited by 1,438
Contrasting Effects of Plant Richness and Composition on Insect Communities: A Field Experiment
Haddad, N. M., Tilman, D., Haarstad, J., Ritchie, M., & Knops, J. M. H. (2001) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/320866 · Cited by 516
Scaling of ?landscapes? in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective
Wiens, J. A., & Milne, B. T. (1989) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf00131172 · Cited by 507
How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity?
Goodwin, B. J., & Fahrig, L. (2002) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.11824.x · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Kareiva, P.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-12
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1809-1816
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988155734
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finding and Losing Host Plants by Phyllotreta: Patch Size and Surrounding Habitat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2937376
- The paper
- Kareiva, P. (1985). Finding and Losing Host Plants by Phyllotreta: Patch Size and Surrounding Habitat. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.