The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Food Security, Population and Environment
Abstract
Human needs are increasingly in jeopardy due to food production. The expansion of food production has cost permanent loss of top soil (24 billion tons/year). In spite of hugh gains made in food production the number of hungry people has increased. Social political and economic constraints determine the extent to which food resources reach those in need. Underlying the constraints are inequities in land ownership frequent choice of low nutrition and perishable foods unequal access to inputs and farm credit limited availability of jobs inequalities in the food market and continuing political neglect. The following issues are discussed: 1) nutritional security maldistribution and absolute shortages; 2) the loss of productivity from the sea; 3) constraints on food production; 4) the need for more suitable farmland; 5) soil depletion; 6) the loss of biodiversity; 7) the loss of genetic diversity; 8) the need reordering of priorities on use of fertilizers irrigation and pesticides; 9) the prospects for expanding food production through genetic engineering reducing postharvest losses and diverting feed to food; and 10) the environmental constraints on increasing food production (air pollution global warming and the population-environment-food interaction). Understanding of agricultural systems and ecology is given as the reason that the American agricultural community and political leaders remain so detached. University training of agronomists has been deficient in providing adequate contact with ecological science in contrast to pure biology. Revelle did not include the possibility that global change may reduce productivity. Optimism is based on blind assumptions that present market systems will effectively respond to environmental deterioration. Nathan Keyfitz has rightly isolated a key empirically backed point of knowledge: that bad politics are widespread and persistent. In order to achieve a theoretically biophysical limit of food production natural capital will irreversibly be depleted and a high standard of living will be compromised. Slowly evolving trends are difficult to see. Social changes are needed to control population invest in agricultural sectors of developing countries reorganize the world trade system for food reduce maldistribution of food and alleviate poverty. 10 billion people much less 5 billion people cannot be nourished even temporarily without these changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity studies: Science and policy
Ehrlich, P. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5021.758 · Cited by 666
Self-citation
Cited by
Sex Pheromones and Their Impact on Pest Management
Witzgall, P., Kirsch, P., & Cork, A. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-009-9737-y · Cited by 1,050
Food security and biodiversity: can we have both? An agroecological analysis
Chappell, M. J., & LaValle, L. A. (2011) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-009-9251-4 · Cited by 474
Biofuels, environmental sustainability and food security: A review of 51 countries
Subramaniam, Y., Masron, T. A., & Azman, N. H. N. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101549 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H., & Daily, G. C.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977987525
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 45.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Food Security, Population and Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2938383
- The paper
- Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H., & Daily, G. C. (1993). Food Security, Population and Environment. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938383
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.