The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Idea of the Moral Economy
Abstract
The moral economic school, which has flourished among anthropologists, economic historians, and classicists, has received only limited attention from political scientists. This is perplexing, since at its core is to be found an intersection of debates over rational choice theory, the character of modern and premarket societies, and the normative standing of the market—in other words, over issues of formidable importance to our discipline. I seek to correct that neglect by mapping out and critically analyzing the moral economists' conception of modernity, their critique of the economic approach to human behavior and institutions, and their attempt to formulate an Aristotelian theory of the economy. These projects, though flawed, together are more than rich enough to provide fertile ground for political scientists and philosophers. I conclude with a discussion of the moral economists' effort to develop a normative theory of the economy together with a related critique of the market.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
Sahlins, M., & Graeber, D. (2017) · Routledge (orig. 1972) · doi:10.4324/9781315184951 · Cited by 3,159
Cited by
Public‐Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do
Bozeman, B. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00165 · Cited by 550
Before “Fair Trade”: Empire, Free Trade, and the Moral Economies of Food in the Modern World
Trentmann, F. (2007) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d448t · Cited by 86
Gifts of Cooperation, Mauss and Pragmatism
Adloff, F. (2016) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9781315692982 · Cited by 61
Kissane, R. J. (2012) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1525/sop.2012.55.1.189 · Cited by 45
Saxer, M. (2012) · Civilisations · doi:10.4000/civilisations.3143 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Booth, W. J.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 653-667
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2038407757
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Idea of the Moral Economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2944801
- The paper
- Booth, W. J. (1994). On the Idea of the Moral Economy. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.