CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18Indigenous Cultures and HistoryColonialism, slavery, and tradeHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

They Were Here All Along: The Native American Presence in Lower-Central New England in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries

Baron, Donna Keith, Hood, J. Edward, Izard, Holly V.·1996·The William and Mary Quarterly
DOI 10.2307/2947204
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Donna Keith Baron, J. Edward Hood, Holly V. Izard, They Were Here All Along: The Native American Presence in Lower-Central New England in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, The William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 3, Indians and Others in Early America (Jul., 1996), pp. 561-586

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2947204

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Baron, D. K., Hood, J. E., & Izard, H. V.
Venue
The William and Mary Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1996-07
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
561
ISSN
0043-5597 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/2947204
OpenAlex
W2328221421
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The William and Mary Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Keywords
Native Americans, 18th century, 19th century, Indigenous presence, colonial New England, Native American history, Native American-European relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review