Identification and Robustness with Contaminated and Corrupted Data
Abstract
Robust estimation aims at developing point estimators that are not highly sensitive to errors in data. However, the population parameters of interest are not identified under the assumptions of robust estimation, so the rationale for point estimation is not apparent. This paper shows that, under error models used in robust estimation, unidentified population parameters can often be bounded. The bounds provide information that is not available in robust estimation. For example, it is possible to bound the population mean under contaminated sampling. It is argued that estimating the bounds is more natural than attempting point estimation of unidentified parameters. Copyright 1995 by The Econometric Society.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar breakdown concepts appear in the partial identification settings of Horowitz and Manski (1995), Kline and Santos (2013), Manski and Pepper (2018), and Masten and Poirier (2020).
“similar”
From A More Credible Approach to Parallel Trends (2023) · cites this paper as Horowitz and Manski (1995)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 337
- Authors
- Horowitz, J. L., & Manski, C. F.
- ORCID
- Manski, Charles F.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007283076
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Econometrica (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
- Keywords
- robust estimation, parameter estimation, contaminated data, corrupted data, parameter bounds, population mean, point estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review