Cited by 337Advanced Statistical Methods and ModelsSurvey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesStatistical and numerical algorithms

Identification and Robustness with Contaminated and Corrupted Data

Horowitz, Joel L., Manski, Charles F.·1995·Econometrica

Abstract

Robust estimation aims at developing point estimators that are not highly sensitive to errors in data. However, the population parameters of interest are not identified under the assumptions of robust estimation, so the rationale for point estimation is not apparent. This paper shows that, under error models used in robust estimation, unidentified population parameters can often be bounded. The bounds provide information that is not available in robust estimation. For example, it is possible to bound the population mean under contaminated sampling. It is argued that estimating the bounds is more natural than attempting point estimation of unidentified parameters. Copyright 1995 by The Econometric Society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2951627

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar breakdown concepts appear in the partial identification settings of Horowitz and Manski (1995), Kline and Santos (2013), Manski and Pepper (2018), and Masten and Poirier (2020).

    “similar”

    From A More Credible Approach to Parallel Trends (2023) · cites this paper as Horowitz and Manski (1995)

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 3 · Cited by 337

Authors
Horowitz, J. L., & Manski, C. F.
Venue
Econometrica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995-03
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
281
ISSN
0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007283076
Cited by
337
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Econometrica (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
Keywords
robust estimation, parameter estimation, contaminated data, corrupted data, parameter bounds, population mean, point estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review