The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data
Abstract
A number of generalizations of the expected utility preference functional are estimated using experimentally generated data involving 100 pairwise choice questions repeated on two separate occasions. Likelihood ratio tests are conducted to investigate the statistical superiority of the various generalizations and the Akaike information criterion is used to distinguish between them. The economic superiority of the various generalizations is also explored and the paper concludes that, for many subjects, the superiority of several of the generalizations is not established. Copyright 1994 by The Econometric Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232669 · Cited by 4,042
Cited by
Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences
Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., & Rutström, E. E. (2008) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00848.x · Cited by 984
Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study
Reutskaja, E., Nagel, R., Camerer, C. F., & Rangel, A. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.900 · Cited by 567
Genetic Variation in Preferences for Giving and Risk Taking*
Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.809 · Cited by 458
Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behavior in a Broad Population
von Gaudecker, H.-M., van Soest, A., & Wengström, E. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.664 · Cited by 349
The Nature of Risk Preferences: Evidence from Insurance Choices
Barseghyan, L., Molinari, F., O'Donoghue, T., & Teitelbaum, J. C. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.6.2499 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Hey, J. D., & Orme, C.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1291
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992558505
- Cited by
- 1,098
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2951750
- The paper
- Hey, J. D., & Orme, C. (1994). Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951750
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
