Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Pathways into Psychiatric Treatment: Some Differences Between Men and Women

Horwitz, Allan·1977·Journal of Health and Social Behavior

Abstract

In this report we test several hypotheses on the different pathways through which ment and women enter psychiatric treatment: women in treatment should have been more likely than men to recognize perceived psychiatric problems, to discuss these problems with other people, and to enter treatment voluntarily. Data from interviews with 120 patients at a community mental health center are consistent with each hypothesis. Several implications of the findings for theories of help-seeking behavior and social control are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2955380

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Horwitz, A.
Venue
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
1977-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
169
ISSN
0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2325255614
Cited by
221
References
0
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pathways into Psychiatric Treatment: Some Differences Between Men and Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2955380
The paper
Horwitz, A. (1977). The Pathways into Psychiatric Treatment: Some Differences Between Men and Women. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. https://doi.org/10.2307/2955380

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.