Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 435

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Dirichlet: A Comprehensive Model of Buying Behaviour

Goodhardt, G. J., Ehrenberg, A. S. C., Chatfield, C.·1984·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General)

Abstract

The model describes how frequently-bought branded consumer products like instant coffee or toothpaste are purchased when the market is stationary and unsegmented. This is the common situation where, over the time-periods analysed, (A) the sales of each brand show little variation, (B) the different brands show no special groupings. We introduce the empirical data in Section 1 and the model itself in Section 2. The model assumes a mixture of distributions at four levels (Section 2.1): (i) Purchasing of the product-class takes the form of a Poisson process for each consumer, (ii) The purchasing rates of different consumers follow a Gamma distribution, (iii) Each consumer's choices among the available brands follow a multinomial distribution, and (iv) These choice probabilities follow a multivariate Beta or Dirichlet distribution across different consumers. In Section 2.2 we give justifications for these assumptions. More importantly, the model has successfully described the patterns observed in more than 40 product-fields (Section 3) and therefore provides interpretative norms (Section 3.1). As input the model only requires the sales level of each brand and two parameters. These can be identified as two aspects of consumer diversity, namely how much people differ from each other in (a) their purchasing rates and (b) their brand-choice preferences (Section 3.2). The model encompasses earlier, more limited formulations which often remain easier to use, as noted in Section 4.1. We briefly review the literature on other models in Section 4.2 and comment on aspects of model-building and on some future areas of work in Section 5.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2981696

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 435

Metadata

Authors
Goodhardt, G. J., Ehrenberg, A. S. C., & Chatfield, C.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General)
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1984
Volume
147
Issue
5
Pages
621
ISSN
0035-9238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2523479672
Cited by
435
References
1
FWCI
35.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.