The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ironing, Sweeping, and Multidimensional Screening
Abstract
We provide existence proofs and characterization results for the multidimensional version of the multiproduct monopolist problem of Mussa and Rosen (1978). These results are also directly applicable to the multidimensional nonlinear pricing problems studied by Wilson (1993) and Armstrong (1996). We establish that bunching is robust in these multidimensional screening problems, even with very regular distributions of types. This comes from a strong conflict between participation constraints and second order incentive compatibility conditions. We consequently design a new technique, the sweeping procedure, for dealing with bunching in multidimensional contexts. This technique extends the ironing procedure of Mussa and Rosen (1978) to several dimensions. We illustrate it on two examples: we first solve a linear quadratic version of the bidimensional nonlinear pricing problem, where consumers' types are exponentially distributed. The solution involves pure bundling for consumers with low demands. The second example is the bidimensional version of the Mussa and Rosen problem when consumers' types are uniformly distributed on a square. The solution is such that the seller offers a full differentiation of products in the upper part of the qualities spectrum, but only limited choice for lower qualities. This seems to be a quite general pattern for multidimensional screening problems. The sweeping procedure is potentially applicable to other multidimensional screening problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimization by Vector Space Methods
(1970) · Students Quarterly Journal · doi:10.1049/sqj.1970.0088 · Cited by 6,004
Myerson, R. B. (1981) · Mathematics of Operations Research · doi:10.1287/moor.6.1.58 · Cited by 5,920
An Introduction to Variational Inequalities and Their Applications
Kinderlehrer, D., & Stampacchia, G. (2000) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719451 · Cited by 4,433
An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation
Mirrlees, J. A. (1971) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2296779 · Cited by 4,375
Increasing risk: I. A definition
Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1970) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(70)90038-4 · Cited by 3,829
Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(78)90085-6 · Cited by 3,306
Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods
Salop, S. C. (1979) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003323 · Cited by 2,975
Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs
Baron, D. P., & Myerson, R. B. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912769 · Cited by 1,721
Monopoly with Incomplete Information
Maskin, E., & Riley, J. (1984) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2555674 · Cited by 1,140
(1978) · North-Holland mathematics studies · doi:10.1016/s0304-0208(08)x7141-5 · Cited by 1,123
Cited by
Athey, S., Bagwell, K., & Sanchirico, C. (2004) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/0034-6527.00286 · Cited by 371
Redistributive Taxation in the Roy Model*
Rothschild, C., & Scheuer, F. (2013) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjs076 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Rochet, J.-C., & Chone, P.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 783
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115565686
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 31.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ironing, Sweeping, and Multidimensional Screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2999574
- The paper
- Rochet, J.-C., & Chone, P. (1998). Ironing, Sweeping, and Multidimensional Screening. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/2999574
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.