The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Short Run and Long Run Causality in Time Series: Theory
Abstract
Causality in the sense of Granger is typically defined in terms of predictibility of a vector of variables one period ahead. Recently, Liitkepohl (1993) proposed to define noncausality between two variables in terms of nonpredictibility at any number of periods ahead. When more than two vectors are considered (i.e., when the information set contains auxiliary variables), these two notions are not equivalent. In this paper, we first generalize the notion of causality by considering causality at a given (arbitrary) horizon h. Then we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for noncausality between vectors of variables (inside a larger vector) up to any given horizon h, where h can be infinite. In particular, for general possibly nonstationary processes with finite second moments, relatively simple exhaustivity and separation conditions, which are sufficient for noncausality at all horizons, are provided. To deal with cases where such conditions do not apply, we consider a more specific, although still very wide, class of vector autoregressive processes (possibly of infinite order, stationary or nonstationary), which include multivariate ARIMA processes, and we derive general parametric characterizations of noncausality at various horizons for this class (including a causality chain characterization). We also observe that the coefficients of lagged variables in forecasts at various horizons h ≥ 1 can be interpreted as generalized impulse response coefficients which yield a complete picture of linear causality properties, in contrast with usual response coefficients which can be quite misleading in this respect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Cited by
On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms
Diebold, F. X., & Yılmaz, K. (2014) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.04.012 · Cited by 4,642
Measuring the Frequency Dynamics of Financial Connectedness and Systemic Risk*
Baruník, J., & Křehlík, T. (2018) · Journal of Financial Econometrics · doi:10.1093/jjfinec/nby001 · Cited by 1,766
Local Projections and VARs Estimate the Same Impulse Responses
Plagborg-Møller, M., & Wolf, C. K. (2021) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta17813 · Cited by 732
Export-led growth: a survey of the empirical literature and some non-causality results. Part 1
A. Giles, J., & Williams, C. L. (2000) · The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development · doi:10.1080/09638190050086177 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Dufour, J.-M., & Renault, E.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1099
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088515074
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short Run and Long Run Causality in Time Series: Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2999631
- The paper
- Dufour, J.-M., & Renault, E. (1998). Short Run and Long Run Causality in Time Series: Theory. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/2999631
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.