The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probability Tables for Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Abstract
In previous papers [3] [4] a ranking method has been described for the rapid approximate determination of the significance of differences between two treatments, when the experimental data consists of unpaired replications, paired replications, or replications occurring in two or more groups. Brief tables were given which furnished the rank totals for the 0.05%o, 0.02% and 0.01% level of significance. These tables were prepared by making use of certain properties of the partitions of numbers, but the method becomes impractical with larger numbers of replicates. A recent paper by Mann and Whitney [1] describes a similar test and gives probability tables covering the range from 3 to 8 replicates per treatment, including the case of unequal numbers of unpaired replicates under the two treatments. These authors tabulated the probabilities against the serial number of possible rank totals, 0-1-2 .... U, instead of the rank total itself. Their tables give probabilities for one tail of the distribution only.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
Self-citation
Cited by
Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 · Cited by 13,912
Andexanet Alfa for the Reversal of Factor Xa Inhibitor Activity
Siegal, D. M., Curnutte, J. T., Connolly, S. J., Lu, G., Conley, P. B., Wiens, B. L., Mathur, V. S., Castillo, J., Bronson, M. D., Leeds, J. M., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1510991 · Cited by 1,047
Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., McDonald, S., Togher, L., Shadish, W., Horner, R., Kratochwill, T., Barlow, D. H., Kazdin, A., et al. (2016) · Archives of Scientific Psychology · doi:10.1037/arc0000027 · Cited by 219
Chatelain, F., Kohl, C., Esser, V., Mcgarry, J. D., Girard, J., & Pegorier, J. (1996) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.00789.x · Cited by 123
Concept learning with differing sequences of instances.
Kurtz, K. H., & Hovland, C. I. (1956) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040295 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilcoxon, F.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1947-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 119
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2330406605
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probability Tables for Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3001946
- The paper
- Wilcoxon, F. (1947). Probability Tables for Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001946
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
