Topical Talk, Ritual and the Social Organization of Relationships
Abstract
This is a study of how acquainted and unacquainted dvads initiated topical talk in an experimental in which they were told to get to knou'' one another or to warm up' before they were to debate an assigned topic. Referencing the uwas a device for initiating talk used by both acquainted and unacquainted dyads. When not doing setting unacquainted dyads introduced topical talk wvith announcements that relied upon interpersonal common knowledge. Unacquainted participants utilized sequences, by which they discovered and displayed categorical memberships and activities. Pre-topical sequences are examined in detailfor how, they allow the in situ negotiation of who will talk and what will be talked about. Pre-topical sequences can also be considered as ritual devices by wthich autobiographical talk is properly initiated. Setting talk, topical announcements, and pre-topical sequences are involved in the ongoing construction of intimacy and distance in relationship.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In natural interaction speech, the sequential embedding of topic shifts has the function of indicating some linguistic context in order to notify the conversation partner(s) of a change of topic.
“In natural interaction speech, the sequential embedding of topic shifts has the function of indicating some linguistic context in order to notify the conversation partner(s) of a change of topic [26], [27].”
From Field evaluation with cognitively-impaired older adults of attention management in the Embodied Conversational Agent Louise (2016) · cites this paper as [26]
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221 · see citing works
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wargnier, P., Carletti, G., Laurent-Corniquet, Y., Benveniste, S., Jouvelot, P., & Rigaud, A.-S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH) · doi:10.1109/segah.2016.7586282 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maynard, D. W., & Zimmerman, D. H.
- ORCID
- Maynard, Douglas W.
- Venue
- Social Psychology Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1984-12
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 301
- ISSN
- 0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2324788945
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 30.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Psychology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- ritual, acquaintance, intimacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review