Cited by 286Action Observation and SynchronizationAttachment and Relationship DynamicsHealth, Education, and Physical Culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nonverbal Synchrony and Rapport: Analysis by the Cross-Lag Panel Technique

LaFrance, Marianne·1979·Social Psychology Quarterly

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3033875

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–284 of 284

Metadata

Authors
LaFrance, M.
Corresponding author
LaFrance, Marianne
Venue
Social Psychology Quarterly
Published
1979-03
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
66
ISSN
0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334778303
Cited by
286
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Psychology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Health, Education, and Physical Culture
Keywords
nonverbal synchrony, rapport, interpersonal synchrony, interpersonal perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review