The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constructing Virtual Justice in the Global Arena
Open accessAbstract
This book by Yves Dezalay and Bryant Garth, both a major empirical and theoretical contribution, has arrived at a propitious time for law and society scholars. If our discipline is not in crisis, it is certainly in a period of transition. As “globalization” has monopolized the attention of policymakers, journalists, futurists, politicians, and the business elite, scholars in law and society have not been far behind. Meetings of the Law and Society Association have become notably more international in their objects, if to a lesser extent in membership and attendance. As our scholarship ventures with more regularity over, under, and beyond the boundaries of nation-states, we encounter new conceptual, methodological, and practical challenges, as well as the exacerbation of some more familiar difficulties. The work of Dezalay and Garth represents one of the most advanced and concerted efforts in our discipline to rise to this array of new (and old) challenges. The book's scope and ambitions are such that a reviewer is compelled to ask whether the authors have presented us with a new paradigm for research in sociology of law in the context of globalization. As I am only presumptuous enough to pose but not to answer that question, this review essay will document both the considerable promise and some possible limitations of the approach developed by Dezalay and Garth, in the hopes of using their work to spark a wider debate on the future of law and society scholarship in conditions of globalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
An Invitation of Reflexive Sociology
Lacombe, D., Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L. J. D., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1993) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3340841 · Cited by 8,375
The science question in feminism
Waters, K. (1987) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/0277-5395(87)90077-x · Cited by 3,804
Gregory, D., Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076072 · Cited by 3,365
The social space and the genesis of groups
Bourdieu, P. (1985) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/bf00174048 · Cited by 2,497
Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives.
Jenkins, R., Calhoun, C., LiPuma, E., & Postone, M. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804373 · Cited by 944
Towards a Reflexive Sociology: A Workshop with Pierre Bourdieu
Wacquant, L. J. D. (1989) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.2307/202061 · Cited by 915
(1994) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470712726 · Cited by 714
Does genderfit? Bourdieu, feminism, and conceptions of social order
McCall, L. (1992) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/bf00992814 · Cited by 422
Rethinking classical theory: The sociological vision of Pierre Bourdieu
Brubaker, R. (1985) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/bf00174049 · Cited by 417
Cited by
Mallard, G. (2019) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/9781108570497 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchanan, R.
- Venue
- Law & Society Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 363-375
- ISSN
- 0023-9216 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5893
- OpenAlex
- W2321043493
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 109.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constructing Virtual Justice in the Global Arena. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3053930
- The paper
- Buchanan, R. (1997). Constructing Virtual Justice in the Global Arena. Law & Society Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053930
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.