The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CONTINUOUS "MORPHING": COMPETING THROUGH DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, FORM, AND FUNCTION.
Abstract
In hypercompetitive environments, the established paradigms of sustainahility of competitive advantage and stability of organizational form may have limited applica-bility. Using an in-depth case analysis of the firms Yahoo! and Excite, this study examines how the organizational form, function, and competitive advantage of these firms dynamically coevolved. Tbe study introduces the concept of continuous mor-phing to descrihe the comprehensive ongoing transformations through wbicb the focal firms sought to regenerate their transient competitive advantage on the Internet. The study of organizational form is at the core of organization science. Organizational scholars use the term "form " to descrihe structural features or patterns of organizations (McKelvey. 1982); econo-mists use it to contrast two alternative coordinating mechanisms, markets and hierarchies (Williamson, 1975); and ecologists, to descrihe organizational characteristics that identify an organization as a memher of a group of similar organizations (Ro-manelli, 1991). Population ecologists, in particular, have advanced the view that stahility and standard-ization of a form positively affect an organization's access to resources (Hannan & Freeman, 1984). Ac-cording to this view, stability leads to consistent actions and outcomes, which resource holders value and reward (Delacroix & Rao, 1993; Hannan & Freeman, 1989), and standardization enhances the legitimacy of a form (Hannan & Carroll, 1992). However, when environmental or resource condi-tions change, the organizational inertia associated with a particular organizational form impedes adaptive change and survival (Hannan & Freeman,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 · Cited by 5,548
Cited by
Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x · Cited by 3,152
“As we review prior definitions (Table II), we find that they share the idea that dynamic capabilities ensure that a firm’s substantive capabilities change over time ( Rindova and Kotha, 2001 ).”
BackgroundAmbidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002 · Cited by 2,431
Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future
Barreto, I. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309350776 · Cited by 1,948
Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0232 · Cited by 1,707
Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223 · Cited by 1,631
Metadata
- Authors
- Rindova, V. P., & Kotha, S.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1263-1280
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2091773503
- Cited by
- 899
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 42.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CONTINUOUS "MORPHING": COMPETING THROUGH DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, FORM, AND FUNCTION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3069400
- The paper
- Rindova, V. P., & Kotha, S. (2001). CONTINUOUS "MORPHING": COMPETING THROUGH DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, FORM, AND FUNCTION. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069400
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.