The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“exposure to cross-cutting political views is associated with diminished political participation25–27.”
From No echo in the chambers of political interactions on Reddit (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Mutz26 arguing that conflicts within one’s own social environment can produce ambivalence, which can in turn reduce the intensity of support for one’s side.”
From No echo in the chambers of political interactions on Reddit (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cites
Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic
Berman, S. (1997) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0008 · Cited by 1,108
Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.19 · Cited by 255
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 888
Social Networks and Social Capital
Giugni, M., & Lorenzini, J. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95142-0_5 · Cited by 9
The Impact of Affective Polarization on Political Participation: A Systematic Review
Lubej, M., Dolezal, M., & Kirbiš, A. (2025) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00323217251338496 · Cited by 11
“In addition, even though political participation is often viewed as a key characteristic of democracy (Gil de Zúñiga et al., 2010; Mutz, 2002; Pattie and Jonston, 2013), its impact is not uniformly positive.”
Casas-Mas, B., Marcellán, M. F., Robles, J. M., & Vélez, D. (2024) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci13020080 · Cited by 10
Polarized opinion states in static networks driven by limited information horizons
Pérez-Martínez, H., Mingueza, F. B., Soriano‐Paños, D., Gómez‐Gardeñes, J., & Floría, L. M. (2023) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113917 · Cited by 6
“This kind of ties is widespread on real-world societies, in which daily-life interactions can bring divergent views close together [46, 30, 33, 34, 35].”
BackgroundRoses and thorns: Political talk in reality TV subreddits
Chen, A., & McCabe, K. T. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221099180 · Cited by 8
“When people detect toxicity, some may be discouraged and retreat from engagement (Kilgo et al., 2018; Theocharis et al., 2016), especially among those with high levels of conflict aversion who tend to avoid contexts where they might encounter contentious interactions (Mutz, 2002).”
BackgroundBurghartswieser, D., & Rothmund, T. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0259445 · Cited by 13
“The societal consequences of selective political exposure on democratic deliberation are a matter of concern [41].”
BackgroundGill, H., & Rojas, H. (2021) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2021.1899008 · Cited by 15
“As an extension of face-to-face communication among existing offline ties (Ishii, 2006), talking about politics within a politically homogeneous IM network may confirm preexisting views, which could stimulate political action (Feezell, 2016; Flanagan, 1991; Mutz, 2002b).”
BackgroundCross-pressures and the European lavender vote: Testing the conditionality of the sexuality gap
Turnbull-Dugarte, S. (2020) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102234 · Cited by 8
“Income is operationalised in the ESS via a ten-point indicator that signals the income percentile to which each respondent identified from the population of each country in a particular year.”
InfluentialParents, Peers, and Politics: The Long-term Effects of Vertical Social Ties
Aggeborn, L., Lajevardi, N., Lindgren, K., Nyman, P., & Oskarsson, S. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1561/100.00019057 · Cited by 9
“, 2014; Nickerson, 2008), are correlational in nature (Huckfeldt and Sprague, 1995; Kenny, 1992; La Due Lake and Huckfeldt, 1998; McClurg, 2003; Mutz, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNeighborhoods That Matter: How Place and People Affect Political Participation
LeVan, C. (2020) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x19852370 · Cited by 8
“Previous research shows that the sociodemographic composition and the partisan/ideological diversity of neighborhoods influence political participation (Cho, Gimpel, & Dyck, 2006; Costa & Kahn, 2003; Enos, 2016, 2018; McClurg, 2006; Mutz, 2002a, 2002b; Oliver, 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialKoenig, M., & Wolf, C. (2019) · doi:10.1515/9783110582611 · Cited by 8
Park, C., & Kaye, B. (2017) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305117717247 · Cited by 8
Using Open-Source Tools to Measure Online Selective Exposure in Naturalistic Settings
Leiner, D. J., Scherr, S., & Bartsch, A. (2016) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2016.1224825 · Cited by 8
“…of multi-optional media environments that can impair political participation (Dilliplane, 2011; Knobloch-Westerwick & Johnson, 2014; Matthes, 2012; Mutz, 2002, 2006), increase political polarization (Garrett, 2009a, 2009b; Knobloch-Westerwick & Meng, 2011), or deepen knowledge gaps (Drew &…”
Cross-cutting Messages and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Same-Sex Marriage Amendment
Shi, Y. (2016) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1076091 · Cited by 8
“This aversion of social conflict can induce individuals to withdraw from political participation (Mutz, 2002b).”
BackgroundInfluentialMedia Use Preference: The Mediating Role of Communication on Political Engagement
Park, K., & You, S. (2015) · doi:10.1017/prp.2015.8 · Cited by 8
“Communication with people having opposing opinions may impede one’s political engagement (Hopmann, 2012; Mutz, 2002).”
BackgroundChallenges and Opportunities for Discussion of Controversial Issues in Racially Pluralistic Schools
Kawashima-Ginsberg, K., & Levine, P. (2015) · Social Education · doi:10.66392/003777215816128020 · Cited by 8
de Rojas, J. M. R., & Cáceres, C. C. (2014) · Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana · doi:10.12804/apl32.03.2014.10 · Cited by 8
Wang, K. Y. (2010) · doi:10.15847/obsobs412010335 · Cited by 8
“According to Mutz (2002), individuals who are faced with cross-cutting pressure from multiple group affiliations often experience two psychological mechanisms in their decision making process: ambivalence and social accountability.”
BackgroundCognitive Discrepancy, Dissonance, and Selective Exposure
Tsang, S. J. (2019) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2017.1282873 · Cited by 7
Ha, S. E. (2009) · doi:10.1177/1532673x08329444 · Cited by 7
University Student Perceptions of the Impact of the Social Unrest in Hong Kong
Ong, E. L. C., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022) · Journal of Intercultural Communication Research · doi:10.1080/17475759.2022.2102058 · Cited by 7
“Consistent with the findings, Mutz (2002) argued that exposure to opinion-challenging information could make people uncertain about their positions.”
Lu, Y., Huang, Y. C., Kao, L., & Chang, Y.-T. (2021) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612211028552 · Cited by 7
“This indicates that, in Chinese societies, the potential exposure to cross-cutting or low-quality political information may not induce ambivalent political views (Mutz 2002, 2006) or negatively shape the formation of political knowledge (Conroy et al. 2012).”
BackgroundThe Political Responses of Virtual Assistants
Ojeda, C. (2019) · Social science computer review · doi:10.1177/0894439319886844 · Cited by 7
“Of course, polarization is not an unequivocal problem (Testa, 2012), exposure to cross-cutting ideas is not an unmitigated good (Mutz, 2002), nor is it guaranteed that virtual assistants will be used as echo chambers.”
BackgroundLeighton, D. C., Brandt, M. J., & Kennedy, L. A. (2019) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/2167696818810618 · Cited by 10
“Specifically in regard to political discussion, social network diversity has been shown to be related to both increased political engagement (Lake & Huckfeldt, 1998) and lower political participation (Mutz, 2002).”
BackgroundMobilizing the Young: The Role of Social Networks
Anderson, C. D., & Stephenson, L. B. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique · doi:10.1017/s0008423918000161 · Cited by 7
Hostile Public Effect: Minority Status Mobilizing Political Participation
Wojcieszak, M. (2015) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv036 · Cited by 7
Solidarity and Discord of Pluralism
Djupe, P. A., & Lewis, A. R. (2015) · doi:10.1177/1532673x14557274 · Cited by 7
“…rely on “cheap” sources of information available within their social environment, including gaining knowledge from agreeable, trustworthy, and knowledgeable cohorts that enables political activity (Downs, 1957; Huckfeldt, 2001; Huckfeldt & Sprague, 1995; McClurg, 2006; Mondak, 1990; Mutz, 2002a).”
BackgroundRaja, R. J. L. (2013) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9259-8 · Cited by 7
“The analysis draws on social-psychology theory, which suggests that the prospect of revealing political preferences might cause some to withdraw from politics (Hayes et al. 2006; Mutz 2002; Ulbig and Funk 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialVariability or Moderation? The Effects of Ambivalence on Political OpinionsPreprint
Mulligan, K. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1905674 · Cited by 7
THE POLITICAL EDUCATION OF JOHN ZALLER
Bartels, L. M. (2012) · doi:10.1080/08913811.2012.788277 · Cited by 7
Turnout Intention and Random Social Networks
Fosco, C., Laruelle, A., & Sánchez, A. (2011) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525911002883 · Cited by 7
“According to some empirical studies, political disagreement within the network tends to dampen turnout [34, 16].”
BackgroundWhite Concern About Black Favoritism in a Biracial Presidential Election
Baek, Y., & Landau, J. (2011) · doi:10.1177/1532673x10374169 · Cited by 7
“Political ambivalence is defined as “the simultaneous presence of both positive and negative considerations directed toward the same attitude object” (Mutz, 2002, p. 843).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialTalking Locally and Voting Globally
Clough, E. (2007) · doi:10.1177/1065912907305681 · Cited by 7
Steiner, N. D., & Hillen, S. (2019) · Identität - Identifikation - Ideologie · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-25604-3_6 · Cited by 7
Embattlement and Resilience Among White Evangelical Democrats
Allen, L. G. (2024) · Political research quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129241253602 · Cited by 6
“There is rich literature that displays how social networks, best described as the web of friendships and acquaintances an individual has, are an important determinant of political preferences (Mutz 2002).”
Stitch incoming: political engagement and aggression on TikTok
McLaughlin, B., Cloudy, J., Hunter, J. A., & Potter, B. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2354436 · Cited by 12
“As people hear a wide range of perspectives and listen to others ’ rationale, they may become more tolerant (Mutz 2002), less hostile (Amsalem, Merkley, and Loewen 2022), more knowledgeable (Mutz and Mondak 2006), and more willing to discuss politics with those who hold opposing perspectives in the…”
Political Ideology and Attitudinal Ambivalence: Investigating the Role of Ideological Extremity
Burger, A. M. (2024) · Social Psychology and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506231222958 · Cited by 6
“…of global evaluations with specific beliefs and assessments (Lavine, 2001), increased likelihood of split-ticket voting (Mulligan, 2011), decreased predictability of political behavior (Basinger & Lavine, 2005; Greene, 2005; Lavine, 2001), and lower turnout (C x akır, 2022; Mutz, 2002).”
Klein, N., & Stavrova, O. (2023) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-023-00034-9 · Cited by 2
Gagrčin, E., Ohme, J., Buttgereit, L., & Grünewald, F. (2023) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v11i3.6641 · Cited by 9
“Such homogeneous information mobilizes political participation (e.g., Lee et al., 2018; Mutz, 2002; Ohme, 2021).”
BackgroundBasile, L. (2023) · Regional & Federal Studies · doi:10.1080/13597566.2023.2179040 · Cited by 6
“Furthermore, interpersonal relations might expose individuals to conflicting views that are likely to discourage voting (Mutz 2002).”
BackgroundTime matters: civic engagement and the development of anti-immigrant attitudes among adolescents
Lundberg, E., & Abdelzadeh, A. (2021) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/s41269-021-00211-w · Cited by 6
“In brief, associations are assumed to be “learning schools for democracy”, fostering democratic attitudes and values such as tolerance and concern for other people (Warren 2001; Mutz 2002; Morales and Geurts 2007).”
BackgroundPartisan Alignment Increases Voter Turnout: Evidence from Redistricting
Fraga, B. L., Moskowitz, D., & Schneer, B. (2021) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-021-09685-y · Cited by 6
“2004) may have a negative effect on turnout; or alternatively, conflict aversion may depress participation in areas with partisan and ideological diversity (Mutz 2002).”
BackgroundDiversity, Disagreement, and Expression across Liberal, Conservative, and Mixed Groups
Peacock, C. (2020) · doi:10.1080/10510974.2020.1819843 · Cited by 6
“…(1) people are less prone to express their political opinions in the face of disagreeing others than with those with whom they agree (Noelle-Neumann, 1974; Ulbig & Funk, 1999) and (2) politically heterogeneous networks are essential for exposing people to diverse opinions (Mutz, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDemocratic youth in counter-attitudinal election climates: A test of the conflict-seeking hypothesis
McDevitt, M., & Hopp, T. (2020) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101194 · Cited by 6
Gerring, J., & Veenendaal, W. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108657099.009
Social Network Disagreement and Reasoned Candidate Preferences
Ekstrom, P. D., Smith, B. A., Williams, A. L., & Kim, H. (2020) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x19858343 · Cited by 6
“…similarly more likely to concede the legitimacy of others’ opinions (Mutz, 2002a, 2006), more tolerant of people who hold those opposing viewpoints (Mutz, 2002a, 2006), and more likely to hold both positive and negative views about their preferred candidate and his or her opponent (Huckfeldt et…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Political Economy of Constitution
Pabst, A., & Scazzieri, R. (2016) · OEconomia · doi:10.4000/oeconomia.2433 · Cited by 6
Contexts, networks, and voting behavior: the social flow of political communication in Italy
Mancosu, M. (2016) · Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica · doi:10.1017/ipo.2016.13 · Cited by 6
“This expectation has been demonstrated by several works (Huckfeldt and Sprague, 1995; Mutz, 2002; Huckfeldt et al., 2004), which show how strong relationships tend to present higher levels of opinions’ homogeneity.”
ResultElectoral turnout in Johannesburg: socio-economic and political determinants
Fauvelle-Aymar, C. (2008) · Transformation · doi:10.1353/trn.0.0002 · Cited by 6
“The second hypothesis that may explain the negative relation between closeness and turnout can be found in the literature on political participation in heterogeneous areas (Mutz 2002, Alesina and La Ferrera 2000).”
BackgroundThe Nature of Online Talk: Incivility of Opposing Views and Affective Polarization
Goel, N., & Merkley, E. (2024) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-024-09998-8 · Cited by 5
“This prospect is rooted in contact theory (Allport, 1954), which in the context of political relations would suggest that encountering belief-challenging information will increase the willingness to compromise and may have a depolarizing effect (Mutz, 2002 ).”
Geurkink, B., Akkerman, A., & Sluiter, R. (2024) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-023-09906-6 · Cited by 7
“Furthermore, discussion of political issues builds understanding of different views of political problems, which increases political trust (Mutz, 2002).”
InfluentialRizki, M., Hidayattullah, M. F., & Af’idah, D. I. (2023) · Infotekmesin · doi:10.35970/infotekmesin.v14i2.1908 · Cited by 5
Frauhammer, L. T., & Neubaum, G. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1146674 · Cited by 8
“…which we measured. significant relationships between cross-cutting exposure and attitude extremity (Wojcieszak et al., 2016), attitudinal ambivalence (Mutz, 2002; Visser and Mirabile, 2004), and attitude certainty (Cargnino and Neubaum, 2022; Gill, 2022), all of which are indicators of…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKim, D. H., Kuru, O., Zeng, J., & Kim, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1151061 · Cited by 7
“On the one hand, in a political context, for instance, individuals’ views are more quickly crystalized when their views are endorsed by their network; accordingly, they are more likely to express their views (Mutz, 2002).”
BackgroundWith a little help from my friends? The impact of social networks on citizens' forecasting ability
Mongrain, P. (2022) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12576 · Cited by 5
Moore, R. C., & Coronel, J. C. (2022) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqac002 · Cited by 7
Song, H., & Cho, J. (2021) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2021.1935824 · Cited by 5
Convery, A., Haines, P. E., Mitchell, J., & Parker, D. (2020) · Journal of Legislative Studies · doi:10.1080/13572334.2020.1850010 · Cited by 7
“The potentially adverse effects of political conflict is well-studied (e.g. Mutz, 2002).”
BackgroundWhose media are hostile? The spillover effect of interpersonal discussions on media bias perceptions
Castro, L., Hopmann, D. N., & Nir, L. (2020) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2019-0140 · Cited by 3
Gerring, J., & Veenendaal, W. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108657099.019
Cao, X. (2020) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2020.1751372 · Cited by 5
“Hence, between-party discussion disagreement should reduce ambivalent political views and, therefore, shorten the time taken to form electoral preference and motivate participation in various political activities (Johnson, 2014; Mutz, 2002b; Nir, 2005).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential3. Political Cognition as Social Cognition: Are We All Political Sophisticates?
Schreiber, D. M. (2019) · doi:10.7208/9780226574431-003 · Cited by 23
NATURAL DISASTERS AND POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: THE CASE OF JAPAN AND THE 2011 TRIPLE DISASTER
Jenkins, M. D. (2019) · Journal of East Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/jea.2019.26 · Cited by 11
“Social network size refers the number of people one interacts with on a regular basis (Wasserman and Faust 1994), and it is well-known to be positively associated a number of forms of political participation (Huckfeldt, Mendez, and Osborn 2004; Ikeda 2012; Mutz 2002).”
BackgroundPolitical tolerance of demobilizing armed actors: The case of FARC in Colombia
Mun, K., Rojas, H., Coppini, D., & Cho, H. H. (2019) · Media, War & Conflict · doi:10.1177/1750635219874734 · Cited by 5
“Namely, exposure to diverse opinions would allow people to rationally think about political issues and increase their level of political tolerance via awareness of the rationale for oppositional opinions (Mutz, 2002a, 2002b) or by developing democratic values (Ekström and Östman, 2013).”
BackgroundDuncan, M., & Coppini, D. (2019) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2019.1644266 · Cited by 5
“Using two theories of peerinfluenced engagement – corrective action (Rojas, 2010) and supportive engagement (Mutz, 2002a) – we examine how these conditions affect opinion change and likelihood of expressing an opinion.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIndividuating information influences partisan judgments
Price‐Blackshear, M. A., Sheldon, K. M., Corcoran, M. J., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2019) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12595 · Cited by 5
Feezell, J. T., & Jones, J. L. (2017) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x17745343 · Cited by 5
“While deliberation is intended to bring about greater understanding of an issue, this often involves exposure to political cross pressures that may have negative consequences for political participation (Mutz, 2002, 2006; Noelle-Neumann, 1984; Wojcieszak, Baek, & Delli Carpini, 2010).”
BackgroundResultThe Upside of the Long Campaign
Fridkin, K., Kenney, P., Wintersieck, A., & Carle, J. (2017) · doi:10.1177/1532673x16677278 · Cited by 5
“Citizens may be exposed to crosscutting viewpoints regarding the candidates (Mutz, 2002) in their social networks via face-to-face discussions (e.g., Huckfeldt & Sprague, 1992; Rosenstone & Hansen, 1993) or online (Bond et al., 2012).”
BackgroundHenderson, W. M., Fitz, B., & Mencken, F. C. (2016) · Journal of Contemporary Religion · doi:10.1080/13537903.2017.1256639 · Cited by 4
The Importance of Generative Models for Assessing Network StructurePreprint
Denny, M. J. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2798493 · Cited by 6
Trousset, S., Gupta, K., Jenkins-Smith, H., Silva, C. L., & Herron, K. G. (2015) · doi:10.1111/psj.12083 · Cited by 5
The Cross-Pressured Citizen in the 2012 Presidential Campaign
Scacco, J. M., & Peacock, C. (2014) · doi:10.1177/0002764213506217 · Cited by 5
“Early studies determined whether someone was cross-pressured by social category membership, such as being both white-collar and Catholic (Mutz, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialScullion, R., Jackson, D., & Molesworth, M. (2013) · doi:10.1080/15377857.2013.781476 · Cited by 5
“The demobilizing effect of network heterogeneity is highlighted by Mutz (2002), where exposure to diverse perspectives in one’s discussion increases social risk while reducing any sense of having a social anchor or bridge, yet Kwak et al.”
BackgroundToward a Nation-Building Operating Concept
DeJarnette, J. C. (2012) · doi:10.21236/ada525583 · Cited by 5
Using the Web to Snowball Discussants of Survey Respondents
Hopmann, D. N. (2012) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.703832 · Cited by 3
“Some hold that “it makes little sense to argue that discussants’ views will influence the respondent even when these views have not been clearly communicated” (Mutz, 2002, p. 843).”
BackgroundCullum, J. G., Okdie, B. M., & Harton, H. (2011) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510.2011.627738 · Cited by 5
“A growing body of research suggests that the social network a person is embedded in plays a prominent role in the stability and change of his or her attitudes (Eaton, Majka, & Visser, 2008; Huckfeldt, Mendez, & Osborn, 2004; Mutz, 2002; Visser & Mirabile, 2004).”
BackgroundHalpern, D. (2013) · Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) · doi:10.7282/t31g0jwh · Cited by 5
The Social Roots of Asian American Partisanship
Raychaudhuri, T. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197826560.001.0001 · Cited by 4
What kind of opposition do citizens want?
Louwerse, T., & Zorina, E. (2025) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2025.2512288 · Cited by 4
“Conflict avoiding individuals view conflict more negatively, while conflict approaching individuals are more positively oriented towards conflict in social interactions (Mutz 2002; Testa et al .”
Sistem Politik Tanpa Partai di Indonesia: Tantangan, Peluang, dan Dampaknya Terhadap Demokrasi
Saputra, M. (2024) · Jurnal Lanskap Politik · doi:10.31942/jlp.2024.2.2.11507 · Cited by 4
“Mengurangi pengaruh partai politik dapat meminimalkan konflik kepentingan, karena pejabat dapat lebih fokus pada kepentingan publik daripada agenda partai (Mutz, 2002).”
BackgroundIntegrated or Segregated? User Behavior Change after Cross-Party Interactions on Reddit
Xia, Y., Monti, C., Keller, B., & Kivelä, M. (2024) · International Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.04923 · Cited by 4
“…studies before the rise of social media indicated that political diversity in one’s social network may decrease one’s participation in politics (Mutz 2002; Huckfeldt, Mendez, and Osborn 2004), and one empirical analysis of Facebook data echoes this finding by showing that political…”
Hertel-Fernandez, A. (2024) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055424000856 · Cited by 4
“Past research has also suggested that participating in politically cross-cutting social networks can be demobilizing (Mutz 2002).”
Kim, J., & Rojas, H. (2024) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2024.2392909 · Cited by 10
“In contrast, heterogeneous talk may enable greater tolerance of differences but deflate political participation, which Mutz (2002, 2006) refers to as the paradox of deliberative democracy.”
Does online privacy self-efficacy help promote e-participation for rights protection?
Hu, S., & Yi, C. (2024) · Journal of Chinese Governance · doi:10.1080/23812346.2024.2395712 · Cited by 4
Wang, W., & Huang, Y. (2024) · Communication and the Public · doi:10.1177/20570473241246290 · Cited by 6
“While exposure to conflicting views can enhance the recognition and understanding of diverse perspectives necessary for a functional deliberative democracy (Price et al., 2002), it can also lead to attitude ambiv-alence and inaction (Mutz, 2002).”
Conservative conservationists: reconciling conflicting identities on climate change
Diamond, E. P. (2022) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2022.2124182 · Cited by 5
“…con fl icts with their short-term policy preferences or evaluations (often driven by another identity), they are considered cross-pressured par-tisans (Berelson, Lazarsfeld, and McFee 1954; Hillygus and Shields 2008; Lazarsfeld, Berelson, and Gaudet 1968; Mutz 2002; Treier and Hillygus 2009).”
BackgroundDeliberating alone: deliberative bias and giving up on political talk
Mclaughlin, B., Wilkinson, K. T., Rendón, H., & Martinez, T. (2022) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqac016 · Cited by 4
Kmetty, Z., & Tardos, R. (2022) · Soc. Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2021.11.011 · Cited by 4
Cross-Cutting exposure, perceived realism, and online political engagement in the age of algorithms
Lin, J.-S. (2022) · Asian Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/01292986.2021.2022175 · Cited by 4
“…environments (Papacharissi, 2009), their feelings of ambivalence (Chen & Lin, 2021; Moehler & Conroy-Krutz, 2016), anxiety over social accountability (Mutz, 2002, 2006), conformity intention (Noelle-Neumann, 1974), and motivated skepticism (Taber & Lodge, 2006) in the face of counter-attitudinal…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNaab, T. K. (2022) · J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl. · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000330 · Cited by 4
Dumbach, M. (2021) · Life in Lockdown · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-03695-9_3 · Cited by 4
Kim, G.-E., Warner, B. R., Kearney, C. C., Park, J., & Kearney, M. (2021) · Argumentation and Advocacy · doi:10.1080/10511431.2021.1955446 · Cited by 4
“Cross-cutting exposure also buffers political participation (Mutz 2002b); and once people are exposed to political disagreement, they are more likely to hold ambivalence about their own political views.”
BackgroundSeeing Red and Blue: Political Discrimination at Work
Thompson, L. R. (2021) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10564926211024358 · Cited by 6
“…fit theory) predict that partisans are biased (Roth et al., 2017), (2) significant political discussion occurs within the workplace (Mutz, 2002; Wyatt et al., 2000), (3) managers’ partisanship influences their corporate decisions (Gupta et al., 2018; Tetlock, 2000), and (4)…”
BackgroundEffects of Knowledge and Reflection in Intrapersonal Deliberation
Yang, T., Wang, Y., & Zhang, W.-Y. (2021) · doi:10.16997/10.16997/jdd.964 · Cited by 4
“On the other hand, more elaborations on the opinion of the topic would make participants notice multiple facets of the topic and lead to ambivalences toward the topic, which may dampen the motivation for future civic engagement (Mutz 2002).”
BackgroundWe’re a good match: Selective political friending on social networking sites
Cargnino, M., Neubaum, G., & Winter, S. (2020) · Communications · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9dmgf · Cited by 4
Schreiber, D. M., Fonzo, G. A., Simmons, A. N., Dawes, C., Flagan, T., & Paulus, M. P. (2020) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2020.1801695 · Cited by 3
“When individuals experience a high degree of social sorting, they are correspondingly more isolated from outgroups and more prone to anger in the face of a potential threat (Mutz 2002a).”
BackgroundSung, W., & Jang, C. (2020) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2020.222 · Cited by 4
“The ideological tendency, which represents the support of a party, is more interested in the news of the supportive tendency, and it decreases the political involvement as it is exposed to the opinion opposite to the support tendency of the individual[13, 24, 25, 28].”
BackgroundBelonging and Political Participation: Evidence from the 2011 President Election in Kyrgyzstan
Gorina, E., & Agadjanian, V. (2019) · European Studies · doi:10.1080/09668136.2019.1665168 · Cited by 4
“Conversations with people of differing political views were shown to weaken an individual’s resolution to vote as a result of exposing them to new political information (Mutz 2002; Costa & Kahn 2004; McClurg 2006).”
BackgroundModel of behavioural strategies for coping with party ambivalence
Chang, C.-C., & Wu, C.-L. (2019) · Political science · doi:10.1080/00323187.2019.1613733 · Cited by 4
“Cross-cutting exposure, defined as exposure to conflicting, incompatible opinions from social interactions, also enters the analysis, because it can lead to ambivalence (Mutz 2002).”
BackgroundOrdinary Political Conversation in Seemingly Nonpolitical Leisure: All Talk and No Action?
Glover, T. D. (2018) · Leisure Sciences · doi:10.1080/01490400.2018.1534626 · Cited by 5
“Furthermore, politically diverse personal networks increase awareness of oppositional viewpoints and political tolerance (Mutz, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Mutz, D. C.
- Corresponding author
- Mutz, Diana C.
- ORCID
- Mutz, Diana C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 838
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2324622157
- Cited by
- 1,265
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 137.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- political participation, social networks, political socialization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review