Cited by 1,265Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationSocial Capital and NetworksSocial Media and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation

Mutz, Diana C.·2002·American Journal of Political Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3088437

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 888

Metadata

Authors
Mutz, D. C.
Corresponding author
Mutz, Diana C.
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2002-10
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
838
ISSN
0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2324622157
Cited by
1,265
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 58
FWCI
137.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
political participation, social networks, political socialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review