Racial/Ethnic Differences in Home Ownership and Housing Quality, 1991
Abstract
This study uses two data sets to examine racial/ethnic differences in three aspects of housing consumption — housing unit inadequacy, proximity to abandoned buildings, and home ownership — in the New York-New Jersey-Long Island metropolitan area and in New York City. In general, the results show that the spatial assimilation model explains the process of home ownership well, but that housing unit quality and neighborhood physical condition respond mainly to indicators of a family's purchasing power. After controlling for group differences in family composition and socioeconomic resources. Black and Hispanic families remained less likely than white families to live in high-quality units and neighborhoods, and all minority families were less likely to own their homes in both locations. These persistent disadvantages may partially reflect preferences for residence apart from whites (see Feagin 1994) but also suggest that the poorer treatment that minority home seekers receive from housing market agents helps to sort Black, Hispanic, and — to a lesser degree — Asian families toward lower-quality housing opportunities than those available to whites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One consequence of governments and private entities' disinvesting in redlined neighborhoods over time is that these areas, even today, lack heat- and flood-mitigating infrastructure relative to neighborhoods with higher HOLC grades.
“One consequence of governments and private entities' disinvesting in redlined neighborhoods over time is that these areas, even today, lack heat-and flood-mitigating infrastructure relative to neighborhoods with higher HOLC grades.141,142”
From NPCC4: Advancing climate justice in climate adaptation strategies for New York City (2024) · cites this paper as [142]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Room With a View or a Room of One’s Own? Housing and Social Stratification
Conley (2001) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1023/a:1011052701810 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
The Tenure Trap: The Vulnerability of Renters to Joint Natural and Technological Disasters
Burby, R. J., Steinberg, L. J., & Basolo, V. (2003) · Urban Affairs Review · doi:10.1177/1078087403253053 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
NPCC4: Advancing climate justice in climate adaptation strategies for New York City
Foster, S. R., Baptista, A., Nguyen, K. H., Tchen, J., Tedesco, M., & Leichenko, R. (2024) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.15148 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rosenbaum, E.
- Affiliations
- Fordham University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rosenbaum, Emily
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-426
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W2082070393
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 11.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Problems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Keywords
- racial and ethnic disparities, homeownership, housing quality, Black families, Latino families, Asian families, housing discrimination, residential segregation, New York City
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review