The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The "Environmental Justice" Frame: A Conceptual Discussion and an Application
Abstract
Drawing on a social constructionist perspective, this paper: (1) identifies some of the most salient dimensions of the “environmental justice” frame as it has emerged from local community struggles over toxic contamination in the United States; and (2) provides an empirical illustration of the emergence and application of this concept in a particular contaminated community, the Carver Terrace neighborhood of Texarkana, Texas. Carver Terrace, an African-American community consisting mostly of homeowners, recently organized to win a federal buyout and relocation after being declared a Superfund site in 1984. Using case study evidence, the paper argues that the residents' ability to mobilize for social change was intimately linked to their adoption of an “environmental justice” frame. The intent of the conceptual discussion of environmental justice and the case study is to clarify the meaning of a term used with increasing frequency and some ambiguity in both popular and academic discourses. This paper documents the process by which the environmental justice frame is constructed in an interplay between the local community and national levels of the antitoxics movement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
Cited by
Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · Cited by 9,953
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: Human Health and Environmental Inequalities
Brulle, R. J., & Pellow, D. N. (2006) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102124 · Cited by 1,117
An Insider's Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective*
Benford, R. D. (1997) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.1997.tb00445.x · Cited by 871
What is the ‘Just Transition’?
Heffron, R. J., & McCauley, D. (2018) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.016 · Cited by 507
A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE METHODOLOGY OF ENVIRONMENTAL RACISM RESEARCH*
Pulido, L. (1996) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.1996.tb00519.x · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-24
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W2030980821
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The "Environmental Justice" Frame: A Conceptual Discussion and an Application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3097023
- The paper
- The "Environmental Justice" Frame: A Conceptual Discussion and an Application. (1993). Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.