The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science
Abstract
This collection of eighteen readings provides a basic text for undergraduates taking sociology of science courses. A general survey of articles published between 1961 and 1981, book is also a useful overview for students taking courses in and political studies of science; science, technology, and society; and social components of courses in environmental sciences, geography, philosophy, and history of science.The editors have organized book around the relationship between subculture of science and wider culture which surrounds it. Looked at from this perpective, science is primarily a source of knowledge and competence.... Thus to stress its interaction with its context not only highlights these aspects of science which most people find of overriding pragmatic interest, but also raises important basic issues concerning credibility, distribution of authority in society, and nature of interaction between different forms of culture.Essays are grouped in five sections: Organization of Academic Science: Communication and Control; Culture of Science; Interaction of Science and Technology; Interaction of Science and Society; Science as Expertise. editors have added a general introduction, part introductions, bibliographical notes, and a lengthy bibliography.Barry Barnes is Lecturer at Science Studies Unit, University of Edinburgh, and editor of an earlier version of this book, The Sociology of Science, published in Penguin Sociology Readings series and now out of print. David Edge is Director of Science Studies Unit at University of Edinburgh and a joint editor of journal, Social Studies of Science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”
Broadus, R. N. (1987) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02016680 · Cited by 1,646
Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
May, C. R., Mair, F., Finch, T., MacFarlane, A., Dowrick, C., Treweek, S., Rapley, T., Ballini, L., Ong, B. N., Rogers, A., et al. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 · Cited by 1,409
Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge
Shapin, S. (1995) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.001445 · Cited by 482
(2015) · Philosophy of Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Pyenson, L., Barnes, B., & Edge, D.
- Venue
- Technology and Culture
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1984-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 132
- ISSN
- 0040-165X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983473310
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3104686
- The paper
- Pyenson, L., Barnes, B., & Edge, D. (1984). Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science. Technology and Culture. https://doi.org/10.2307/3104686
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.