Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 877

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Community Organization and Rural Development: A Learning Process Approach

Korten, David C.·1980·Public Administration Review

Abstract

Through a grant made available by The Ford Founda­ tion, PAR is pleased to present to its readers a compre­ hensively documented, in-depth research study on Com­ munity Organization and Rural Development: A Learning Process Approach, by David C. Korten. This study com­ bines both extensive and intensive analysis of develop­ ment assistance programs in Asia, and focuses specifically on five case studies which provide the basis for the author's strong conviction that Third World development assistance programs must be part of a holistically perceived learning process as opposed to a bureaucratically mandated blue­ print design. Stated in the abstract, this proposition, in and of itself, should cause no surprise. The real value of Kor­ ten's efforts, however, may be found in his case studies which provide rich insights into just what can be accom­ plished in the way of social development if the development

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3110204

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 877

Metadata

Authors
Korten, D. C.
Venue
Public Administration Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1980-09
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
480
ISSN
0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056297441
Cited by
877
References
0
FWCI
53.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community Organization and Rural Development: A Learning Process Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3110204
The paper
Korten, D. C. (1980). Community Organization and Rural Development: A Learning Process Approach. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110204

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.