The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Capital and Natural Capital: A Comparative Analysis of Land Tenure and Natural Resource Management in Guatemala
Abstract
This paper argues that the existence of social capital can substitute for well-defined legal property rights in both private and common property resource tenure regimes. A comparative analysis of two regions in Guatemala suggests that, where significant social capital exists among natural resource users, it fosters a sense of ownership and respect for boundaries, and provides the foundation for use rules, monitoring, and enforcement mechanisms which help preserve the natural resource base. In contrast, an absence of social capital in a situation where property rights are poorly defined can lead to resource mining in both private and common property regime
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The dimensions of soil security
McBratney, A., Field, D. J., & Koch, A. (2014) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.013 · Cited by 867
Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes
Jackson, L. E., Pascual, U., & Hodgkin, T. (2007) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.017 · Cited by 560
Sherbinin, A. D., Carr, D., Cassels, S., & Jiang, L. (2007) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.32.041306.100243 · Cited by 305
Bandeira, P., Sumpsi, J. M., & Falconi, C. (2010) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.04.005 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, E. G.
- Venue
- Land Economics
- Publisher
- University of Wisconsin Press
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 114
- ISSN
- 0023-7639 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1946067152
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Capital and Natural Capital: A Comparative Analysis of Land Tenure and Natural Resource Management in Guatemala. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3147261
- The paper
- Katz, E. G. (2000). Social Capital and Natural Capital: A Comparative Analysis of Land Tenure and Natural Resource Management in Guatemala. Land Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
