The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires
Abstract
A comprehensive literature review of techniques used to increase response rates to questionnaires was conducted. Conclusions were based on arithmetic combination of 497 response rates found in 93 j...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique.
Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0023552 · Cited by 1,637
Cited by
Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726708094863 · Cited by 3,462
Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals
Asch, D. A., Jedrziewski, M. K., & Christakis, N. A. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00126-1 · Cited by 2,110
An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory
Malhotra, M. K., & Grover, V. (1998) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00021-7 · Cited by 1,313
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
Shih, T.-H., & Fan, X. (2008) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x08317085 · Cited by 1,159
Introduction: Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse
Rogelberg, S. G., & Stanton, J. M. (2007) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106294693 · Cited by 1,048
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, J., & Cooper, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1983-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065245268
- Cited by
- 706
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3151410
- The paper
- Yu, J., & Cooper, H. (1983). A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151410
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
