The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Is Female to Male as Nature Is to Culture?
Abstract
Much of the creativity of anthropology derives from the tension between two sets of demands: that we explain human universals, and that we explain cultural particulars. By this canon, woman provides us with one of the more challenging problems to be dealt with. The secondary status of woman in society is one of the true universals, a pan-cultural fact. Yet within that universal fact, the specific cultural conceptions and symbolizations of woman are extraordinarily diverse and even mutually contradictory. Further, the actual treatment of women and their relative power and contribution vary enormously from culture to culture, and over different periods in the history of particular cultural traditions. Both of these points – the universal fact and the cultural variation constitute problems to be explained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919
The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens
Benhabib, S. (2004) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790799 · Cited by 2,180
The Nature of Gender: Work, Gender, and Environment
Nightingale, A. (2006) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d01k · Cited by 473
Emotion, Thought, and Estrangement: Emotion as a Cultural Category
Lutz, C. (1986) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.1525/can.1986.1.3.02a00020 · Cited by 448
Winter, N. J. G. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Ortner, S. B.
- Venue
- Feminist Studies
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1972
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 5
- ISSN
- 0046-3663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W188240590
- Cited by
- 1,464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Female to Male as Nature Is to Culture? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3177638
- The paper
- Ortner, S. B. (1972). Is Female to Male as Nature Is to Culture? Feminist Studies. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177638
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.